About: Moore v. Regents of the University of California

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Moore v. Regents of the University of California Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatPossibleCut-and-pasteMoves, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FMoore_v._Regents_of_the_University_of_California

Moore v. Regents of the University of California was a landmark Supreme Court of California decision. Filed on July 9, 1990, it dealt with the issue of property rights to one's own cells taken in samples by doctors or researchers.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Act100030358 yago:Action100037396 yago:Case107308889 yago:Choice100161243 yago:Decision100162632 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:Move100165942 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:WikicatPossibleCut-and-pasteMoves
rdfs:label	Moore v. Regents of the University of California (en)
rdfs:comment	Moore v. Regents of the University of California was a landmark Supreme Court of California decision. Filed on July 9, 1990, it dealt with the issue of property rights to one's own cells taken in samples by doctors or researchers. (en)
dcterms:subject	1990 in United States case law 1990 in California California state case law Bioethics United States property case law University of California litigation
Wikipage page ID	4217717 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1069487418 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	1990 in United States case law Property Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center Joyce L. Kennard Informed consent Spleen Strict liability 1990 in California Medical research Next (Crichton novel) Edward A. Panelli Conversion (law) Stanley Mosk Tort HeLa Allen Broussard California state case law Reasonable person Hairy cell leukemia HGB The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks (film) Armand Arabian Bioethics United States property case law Chemical formula Chilling effect (law) Supreme Court of California University of California litigation Bone marrow Splenectomy Robert Crichton (novelist) Rebecca Skloot Seattle, Washington Genetics Institute, Inc. White blood cell Malcolm M. Lucas The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks California Court of Appeal Bodily fluids Cell line David N. Eagleson Fiduciary duty
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://web.archive.org/web/20180510144641/http:/www.eejlaw.com/materials/Moore_v_Regents_T08.pdf http://www.genengnews.com/articles/chitem.aspx%3Faid=1880%7Cwork=Biobusiness https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/casebrief/p/casebrief-moore-v-regents-of-univ-of-cal http://online.ceb.com/CalCases/C3/51C3d120.htm
sameAs	Moore v. Regents of the University of California Moore v. Regents of the University of California Moore v. Regents of the University of California
Subsequent	Remanded back to Court of Appeal for further proceedings (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Citation_needed dbt:Cite_book dbt:Cite_news dbt:Reflist dbt:Sfnp dbt:Law_report dbt:Infobox_California_Supreme_Court_case dbt:Medical_ethics_cases
Dissent	Mosk (en)
JoinMajority	Lucas, Eagleson, Kennard (en)
Prior	Review granted, California Court of Appeal decision depublished (en)
citations	17280.0 (second)
DecideDate	0001-07-09 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1990 (xsd:integer)
fullname	John Moore, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. The Regents of the University of California et al., Defendants and Respondents (en)
Holding	Plaintiff stated a cause of action in lack of informed consent and breach of fiduciary duty, but not in conversion (en)
Litigants	Moore v. Regents of the University of California (en)
majority	Panelli (en)
has abstract	Moore v. Regents of the University of California was a landmark Supreme Court of California decision. Filed on July 9, 1990, it dealt with the issue of property rights to one's own cells taken in samples by doctors or researchers. In 1976, John Moore was treated for hairy cell leukemia by physician David Golde, a cancer researcher at the UCLA Medical Center. Moore's cancer cells were later developed into a cell line that was commercialized by Golde and UCLA. The California Supreme Court ruled that a hospital patient's discarded blood and tissue samples are not his personal property and that individuals do not have rights to a share in the profits earned from commercial products or research derived from their cells. Following this decision, most U.S. courts have ruled against family members who sue researchers and universities over the "improper commercialization" of their dead family member's body parts. (en)
AssociateJudges	Joyce L. Kennard Edward A. Panelli Stanley Mosk Allen Broussard Armand Arabian David N. Eagleson
ChiefJudge	Malcolm M. Lucas
Concurrence	Arabian (en)
Concurrence/Dissent	Broussard (en)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 49 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software