Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership, 564 U.S. 91 (2011), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. Under 35 U.S.C. § 282, a patent is entitled to a presumption of validity in court. In i4i, the Court held that when a court reviews the validity of a patent, the presumption may only be overcome based on clear and convincing evidence.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership, 564 U.S. 91 (2011), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. Under 35 U.S.C. § 282, a patent is entitled to a presumption of validity in court. In i4i, the Court held that when a court reviews the validity of a patent, the presumption may only be overcome based on clear and convincing evidence. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
docket
| |
JoinMajority
| - Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Kagan (en)
|
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership, (en)
|
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership (en)
|
majority
| |
other source
| |
other url
| |
has abstract
| - Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership, 564 U.S. 91 (2011), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. Under 35 U.S.C. § 282, a patent is entitled to a presumption of validity in court. In i4i, the Court held that when a court reviews the validity of a patent, the presumption may only be overcome based on clear and convincing evidence. The case was a patent dispute between i4i Ltd. Partnership and Microsoft: i4i charged that Microsoft Word infringed on i4i's patent; Microsoft argued that the clear and convincing evidence standard applied by the Federal Circuit was inappropriate and that a preponderance of the evidence standard should be applied. The Court rejected Microsoft's position. (en)
|
Concurrence
| |
googlescholar
| |
JoinConcurrence
| |
NotParticipating
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |