McNeil v. Wisconsin, 501 U.S. 171 (1991), held that the right to counsel secured by the Sixth Amendment and the right to counsel protected by Miranda v. Arizona are separate and distinct, such that invoking one does not implicitly invoke the other.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| |
rdfs:comment
| - McNeil v. Wisconsin, 501 U.S. 171 (1991), held that the right to counsel secured by the Sixth Amendment and the right to counsel protected by Miranda v. Arizona are separate and distinct, such that invoking one does not implicitly invoke the other. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Paul McNeil v. State of Wisconsin (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| |
JoinDissent
| |
JoinMajority
| - Rehnquist, White, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter (en)
|
LawsApplied
| |
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| - Defendant was convicted of murder, and the conviction was affirmed by the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari. (en)
|
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - McNeil v. Wisconsin, (en)
|
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - Paul McNeil v. State of Wisconsin (en)
|
Holding
| - Invoking the Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not implicitly invoke rights secured by Miranda v. Arizona. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| |
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - McNeil v. Wisconsin, 501 U.S. 171 (1991), held that the right to counsel secured by the Sixth Amendment and the right to counsel protected by Miranda v. Arizona are separate and distinct, such that invoking one does not implicitly invoke the other. (en)
|
Concurrence
| |
cornell
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |