M.C. and Others v Italy (also known as Affaire M. C. et Autres c. Italie) is a case decided by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on 3 September 2013 in which Article 1 of Protocol 1 (A1P1) was engaged due to the applicants not being afforded annual uprating which the court deemed damage to their property of a disproportionate character in the form of an exorbitant charge. The Strasbourg ruling sets an important precedent for higher monthly compensation payments to be paid to the 60,000 or so victims of contaminated blood transfusions in Italy.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdfs:label
| - M.C. and Others v Italy (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - M.C. and Others v Italy (also known as Affaire M. C. et Autres c. Italie) is a case decided by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on 3 September 2013 in which Article 1 of Protocol 1 (A1P1) was engaged due to the applicants not being afforded annual uprating which the court deemed damage to their property of a disproportionate character in the form of an exorbitant charge. The Strasbourg ruling sets an important precedent for higher monthly compensation payments to be paid to the 60,000 or so victims of contaminated blood transfusions in Italy. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
chamber
| |
court
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - Affaire M. C. et Autres c. Italie (en)
|
keywords
| - (en)
- Damage to property (en)
- Abnormal and exorbitant charge (en)
- Annual uprating (en)
- Permanent damage (en)
- Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (en)
- Violation of Article 14 (en)
|
language
| |
nationality
| |
shortname
| - M.C. and Others v Italy (en)
|
has abstract
| - M.C. and Others v Italy (also known as Affaire M. C. et Autres c. Italie) is a case decided by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on 3 September 2013 in which Article 1 of Protocol 1 (A1P1) was engaged due to the applicants not being afforded annual uprating which the court deemed damage to their property of a disproportionate character in the form of an exorbitant charge. The Strasbourg ruling sets an important precedent for higher monthly compensation payments to be paid to the 60,000 or so victims of contaminated blood transfusions in Italy. (en)
|
CaseNumber
| |
ECLI
| |
InstrumentsCited
| - Legislative Decree No. 78/2010 https://def.finanze.it/DocTribFrontend/getAttoNormativoDetail.do?ACTION=getSommario&id={147A06D6-9990-42F4-ADF0-C57A278A9C82} (en)
|
judge
| - Guido Raimondi (en)
- Işıl Karakaş (en)
- Nebojša Vučinić (en)
- Dragoljub Popović (en)
- Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque (en)
- Peer Lorenzen (en)
|
JudgePresident
| |
JudgeRapporteur
| |
ruling
| - The Italian Government infringed the principle of the rule of law and the right to a fair hearing.
The court required Italy to pay the supplementary compensation allowance with annual uprating. (en)
|
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |