About: Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FLujan_v._G_%26_G_Fire_Sprinklers%2C_Inc.

Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc., 532 U.S. 189 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2001. The case concerned a provision of the California Labor Code which allowed the state to withhold payment to contractors or subcontractors if found in breach of contract, without a specific hearing on the matter. The Court upheld the provision because the companies were still able to pursue a claim in state court.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc. (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc., 532 U.S. 189 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2001. The case concerned a provision of the California Labor Code which allowed the state to withhold payment to contractors or subcontractors if found in breach of contract, without a specific hearing on the matter. The Court upheld the provision because the companies were still able to pursue a claim in state court. (en)
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Arthur S. Lujan, Labor Commissioner of California, et al., v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Incorporated (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
Subsequent
  • Ninth Circuit Reversed, injunction vacated (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
JoinMajority
  • unanimous (en)
LawsApplied
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
USPage
USVol
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
  • Lujan v. G&G Fire Sprinklers, Inc., (en)
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
  • Arthur S. Lujan, Labor Commissioner of California, et al., v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Incorporated (en)
Holding
  • Even though there is no hearing under the state contractual scheme, because plaintiffs can bring claims in state court, there is no violation of due process (en)
justia
Litigants
  • Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc. (en)
majority
  • Rehnquist (en)
has abstract
  • Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc., 532 U.S. 189 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2001. The case concerned a provision of the California Labor Code which allowed the state to withhold payment to contractors or subcontractors if found in breach of contract, without a specific hearing on the matter. The Court upheld the provision because the companies were still able to pursue a claim in state court. (en)
cornell
googlescholar
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is Wikipage redirect of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 60 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software