The legal system of South Korea is a civil law system that has its basis in the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. The Court Organization Act, which was passed into law on 26 September 1949, officially created a three-tiered, independent judicial system. The revised Constitution of 1987 codified judicial independence in Article 103, which states that, "Judges rule independently according to their conscience and in conformity with the Constitution and the law." The 1987 rewrite also established the Constitutional Court, the first time that South Korea had an active body for constitutional review.
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Law of South Korea (en)
- Droit sud-coréen (fr)
- 韓国法 (ja)
- 대한민국의 법 (ko)
- 韩国法律 (zh)
|
| rdfs:comment
| - Le droit sud-coréen est le droit de tradition civiliste appliqué en Corée du Sud. (fr)
- 대한민국의 법은 대한민국에서 제정, 공포되고 시행되고 있는 법령을 말한다. 대한민국헌법은 1948년 제정된 이후, 총 9차례의 개헌을 거쳐 현재에 이른다. 헌법은 주로 대륙법 체계에 기반하고 있으나 건국 초기의 상황의 특수성 등에 의하여 여러 독자적 요소가 존재한다. 1953년 제정된 형법은 그 세부조항을 보았을 때 과거 의용하던 일본 구형법과 유사하므로, 현대 일본형법과 비교하였을 때 법정형이 무거운 편이며 특히 국가의 법익에 반하는 범죄를 엄격히 처벌한다. 민법은 일본 구민법을 의용하고 있다가 1958년이 되어서야 신민법이 공포되었는데, 그 체계가 일본법에 기반함은 명확하나 형식주의와 같은 독일법적 요소가 다소 중시된 한편 국내의 관습을 반영하여 가족법에 관하여서는 많은 제한이 있는 것이 특징적이다. (ko)
- 韓国法（かんこくほう）では、大韓民国（韓国）の法制度の概要について論じる。大陸法の制度であり、その基礎を大韓民国憲法に置いている。 (ja)
- The legal system of South Korea is a civil law system that has its basis in the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. The Court Organization Act, which was passed into law on 26 September 1949, officially created a three-tiered, independent judicial system. The revised Constitution of 1987 codified judicial independence in Article 103, which states that, "Judges rule independently according to their conscience and in conformity with the Constitution and the law." The 1987 rewrite also established the Constitutional Court, the first time that South Korea had an active body for constitutional review. (en)
- 韓國法律制度屬於大陆法系，以韩国宪法为基础，並吸收部分英美法系特点。韓國於1949年通過《法院組織法》后，正式建立的獨立司法系統。1987年修訂之憲法中，第103條「法官依其良心，據本憲法及法律之規定，獨立審判」的條文，再次確認司法獨立。是次憲法修訂亦設置韩国宪法法院，建立積極違憲審查制度。 韓國的訴訟採大陸式糾問式訴訟，與英美法系之對抗制有顯著不同。該國檢察官直接或間接調查刑事案件，與中國、日本的制度類似。另一與英美法系顯著不同的是，檢警審訊嫌疑人時若無辯護律師在場，其審訊紀錄是否有效的規定：若嫌疑人在預備程序或審判時確認紀錄為真，即使無辯護律師在場，其供詞依然有效。若被告否認紀錄為真，但有間接證據證明紀錄之可信，該紀錄依然有效。惟被告若否認警詢紀錄為真，警詢紀錄則無效。 韓國的宪法和刑法典均明文禁止溯及既往與違反正當程序。憲法規定，對人民的逮捕、拘留、搜查或羈押需要法官核可，除非是現行犯或罪證確鑿，且行為人有湮滅證據或逃亡之虞，才可事後補發令狀。此外，不得對嫌疑人實施酷刑，亦不得強制嫌疑人自證己罪。憲法亦保障因犯罪而被捕之人，有委託律師協助的權利，並有權向法院申请人身保护令。 韓國以《六法全書》，即憲法、民法、刑法、商法、民事訴訟法與刑事訴訟法為最通用之法律。 (zh)
|
| foaf:depiction
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Wikipage page ID
| |
| Wikipage revision ID
| |
| Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
| Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
| sameAs
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| thumbnail
| |
| has abstract
| - The legal system of South Korea is a civil law system that has its basis in the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. The Court Organization Act, which was passed into law on 26 September 1949, officially created a three-tiered, independent judicial system. The revised Constitution of 1987 codified judicial independence in Article 103, which states that, "Judges rule independently according to their conscience and in conformity with the Constitution and the law." The 1987 rewrite also established the Constitutional Court, the first time that South Korea had an active body for constitutional review. The Korean judicial system is based on a continental style inquisitorial system, which is markedly different from the English adversarial system. Like Chinese prosecutors and Japanese prosecutors also, Korean prosecutors directly or indirectly conduct criminal investigations. Another departure from the British/American system is the admissibility of suspect interrogation records produced by the prosecutors without defense counsel being present. A confession made without assistance of legal counsel is admissible if the suspect confirms the authenticity of the record at a preparatory hearing or during the trial. If the suspect denies its authenticity, the record could still be admissible if there is a circumstantial guarantee of trustworthiness. However, a record made by a police officer is inadmissible if the suspect denies authenticity later in the process. Both the Constitution and the Penal Code contain provisions that prohibit ex post facto laws and violations of due process. In addition, the Constitution requires judicial warrants for arrest, detention, search, or seizure, except where a person suspected of a crime is caught in flagrante delicto or where a person suspected of a sufficiently serious crime poses a risk of escape or destruction of evidence, in which cases an ex post facto warrant may be issued. Additionally, no criminal suspect may be tortured or compelled to testify against himself. The Constitution also requires that a person arrested for a crime be given assistance of counsel and have the right to petition the court for habeas corpus. Citizens of the Republic of Korea are guaranteed various civil rights and protections by Chapter II of the Constitution, which also imposes the duties of military service and taxes. These rights can be suspended however, for the purposes of social order and national security. The National Security Act prohibits "anti-government activities", which effectively criminalizes activities such as promoting anti-government ideologies (especially communism) and joining anti-government organizations. (en)
- Le droit sud-coréen est le droit de tradition civiliste appliqué en Corée du Sud. (fr)
- 대한민국의 법은 대한민국에서 제정, 공포되고 시행되고 있는 법령을 말한다. 대한민국헌법은 1948년 제정된 이후, 총 9차례의 개헌을 거쳐 현재에 이른다. 헌법은 주로 대륙법 체계에 기반하고 있으나 건국 초기의 상황의 특수성 등에 의하여 여러 독자적 요소가 존재한다. 1953년 제정된 형법은 그 세부조항을 보았을 때 과거 의용하던 일본 구형법과 유사하므로, 현대 일본형법과 비교하였을 때 법정형이 무거운 편이며 특히 국가의 법익에 반하는 범죄를 엄격히 처벌한다. 민법은 일본 구민법을 의용하고 있다가 1958년이 되어서야 신민법이 공포되었는데, 그 체계가 일본법에 기반함은 명확하나 형식주의와 같은 독일법적 요소가 다소 중시된 한편 국내의 관습을 반영하여 가족법에 관하여서는 많은 제한이 있는 것이 특징적이다. (ko)
- 韓国法（かんこくほう）では、大韓民国（韓国）の法制度の概要について論じる。大陸法の制度であり、その基礎を大韓民国憲法に置いている。 (ja)
- 韓國法律制度屬於大陆法系，以韩国宪法为基础，並吸收部分英美法系特点。韓國於1949年通過《法院組織法》后，正式建立的獨立司法系統。1987年修訂之憲法中，第103條「法官依其良心，據本憲法及法律之規定，獨立審判」的條文，再次確認司法獨立。是次憲法修訂亦設置韩国宪法法院，建立積極違憲審查制度。 韓國的訴訟採大陸式糾問式訴訟，與英美法系之對抗制有顯著不同。該國檢察官直接或間接調查刑事案件，與中國、日本的制度類似。另一與英美法系顯著不同的是，檢警審訊嫌疑人時若無辯護律師在場，其審訊紀錄是否有效的規定：若嫌疑人在預備程序或審判時確認紀錄為真，即使無辯護律師在場，其供詞依然有效。若被告否認紀錄為真，但有間接證據證明紀錄之可信，該紀錄依然有效。惟被告若否認警詢紀錄為真，警詢紀錄則無效。 韓國的宪法和刑法典均明文禁止溯及既往與違反正當程序。憲法規定，對人民的逮捕、拘留、搜查或羈押需要法官核可，除非是現行犯或罪證確鑿，且行為人有湮滅證據或逃亡之虞，才可事後補發令狀。此外，不得對嫌疑人實施酷刑，亦不得強制嫌疑人自證己罪。憲法亦保障因犯罪而被捕之人，有委託律師協助的權利，並有權向法院申请人身保护令。 大韩民国公民的各种权利受到《宪法》第二章的保障，其中还规定了服兵役和纳税的义务。不過，韓國政府可以基於維護社會秩序或國家安全之目的，限制上述權利。《国家安全法》禁止「反政府活动」，事實上將宣传敵對意识形态（特别是共产主义）和加入反政府组织等行為入罪。 韓國以《六法全書》，即憲法、民法、刑法、商法、民事訴訟法與刑事訴訟法為最通用之法律。 (zh)
|
| gold:hypernym
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)
