About: Hurst v. Florida     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FHurst_v._Florida

Hurst v. Florida, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court, in an 8–1 ruling, applied the rule of Ring v. Arizona to the Florida capital sentencing scheme, holding that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find the aggravating factors necessary for imposing the death penalty. In Florida, under a 2013 statute, the jury made recommendations but the judge decided the facts.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Hurst v. Florida
rdfs:comment
  • Hurst v. Florida, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court, in an 8–1 ruling, applied the rule of Ring v. Arizona to the Florida capital sentencing scheme, holding that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find the aggravating factors necessary for imposing the death penalty. In Florida, under a 2013 statute, the jury made recommendations but the judge decided the facts.
foaf:name
  • Timothy Lee Hurst, Petitioner v. Florida
dct:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
ArgueDate
  • --10-13
OpinionAnnouncement
other source
  • Supreme Court
other url
has abstract
  • Hurst v. Florida, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court, in an 8–1 ruling, applied the rule of Ring v. Arizona to the Florida capital sentencing scheme, holding that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find the aggravating factors necessary for imposing the death penalty. In Florida, under a 2013 statute, the jury made recommendations but the judge decided the facts.
ArgueYear
case
  • Hurst v. Florida,
DecideDate
  • --01-12
DecideYear
Holding
  • Florida's capital sentencing scheme violates the Sixth Amendment in light of Ring v. Arizona.
JoinMajority
  • Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Kagan
justia
LawsApplied
Litigants
  • Hurst v. Florida
ParallelCitations
  • 172800.0
Prior
  • 259200.0
USPage
  • ___
USVol
Concurrence
  • Breyer
Dissent
  • Alito
Docket
oyez
fullname
  • Timothy Lee Hurst, Petitioner v. Florida
majority
  • Sotomayor
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git97 as of Feb 07 2022


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3323 as of May 9 2022, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc25), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 41 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2022 OpenLink Software