Hodgson v. Minnesota, 497 U.S. 417 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court abortion rights case that dealt with whether a state law may require notification of both parents before a minor can obtain an abortion. The law in question provided a judicial alternative.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Hodgson v. Minnesota (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Hodgson v. Minnesota, 497 U.S. 417 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court abortion rights case that dealt with whether a state law may require notification of both parents before a minor can obtain an abortion. The law in question provided a judicial alternative. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - Jane Elizabeth Hodgson, et al. v. Minnesota, et al. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
superseded
| - Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (en)
|
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| |
JoinMajority
| - Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, O'Connor (en)
|
LawsApplied
| - U.S. Const. amend. XIV; Minn. Stat. ยงยง 144.343- (en)
|
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| - Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (en)
|
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - Hodgson v. Minnesota, (en)
|
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
findlaw
| |
fullname
| - Jane Elizabeth Hodgson, et al. v. Minnesota, et al. (en)
|
Holding
| - It is constitutional to require a notification to one parent if there is a possible judicial bypass when the young woman could maturely demonstrate that notification would be unwise. (en)
- It is constitutional to impose a 48-hour waiting period. (en)
- With respect to the planned abortion of a juvenile: (en)
- It is unconstitutional to require a notification to both parents, whether or not both wanted to know or had taken responsibility for raising the child. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - Hodgson v. Minnesota (en)
|
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - Hodgson v. Minnesota, 497 U.S. 417 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court abortion rights case that dealt with whether a state law may require notification of both parents before a minor can obtain an abortion. The law in question provided a judicial alternative. (en)
|
Concurrence
| - Stevens (en)
- O'Connor (en)
|
Concurrence/Dissent
| - Kennedy (en)
- Marshall (en)
- Scalia (en)
|
JoinConcurrence
| - Brennan (en)
- O'Connor (en)
|
JoinConcurrence/Dissent
| - Brennan, Blackmun (en)
- Rehnquist, White, Scalia (en)
|