About: Hodgson v. Minnesota     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FHodgson_v._Minnesota

Hodgson v. Minnesota, 497 U.S. 417 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court abortion rights case that dealt with whether a state law may require notification of both parents before a minor can obtain an abortion. The law in question provided a judicial alternative.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Hodgson v. Minnesota (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Hodgson v. Minnesota, 497 U.S. 417 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court abortion rights case that dealt with whether a state law may require notification of both parents before a minor can obtain an abortion. The law in question provided a judicial alternative. (en)
foaf:name
  • Jane Elizabeth Hodgson, et al. v. Minnesota, et al. (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
superseded
  • Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
Dissent
  • Stevens (en)
JoinMajority
  • Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, O'Connor (en)
LawsApplied
  • U.S. Const. amend. XIV; Minn. Stat. ยงยง 144.343- (en)
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
  • Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (en)
USPage
USVol
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
  • Hodgson v. Minnesota, (en)
DecideDate
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
  • Jane Elizabeth Hodgson, et al. v. Minnesota, et al. (en)
Holding
  • It is constitutional to require a notification to one parent if there is a possible judicial bypass when the young woman could maturely demonstrate that notification would be unwise. (en)
  • It is constitutional to impose a 48-hour waiting period. (en)
  • With respect to the planned abortion of a juvenile: (en)
  • It is unconstitutional to require a notification to both parents, whether or not both wanted to know or had taken responsibility for raising the child. (en)
justia
Litigants
  • Hodgson v. Minnesota (en)
majority
  • Stevens (en)
loc
has abstract
  • Hodgson v. Minnesota, 497 U.S. 417 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court abortion rights case that dealt with whether a state law may require notification of both parents before a minor can obtain an abortion. The law in question provided a judicial alternative. (en)
Concurrence
  • Stevens (en)
  • O'Connor (en)
Concurrence/Dissent
  • Kennedy (en)
  • Marshall (en)
  • Scalia (en)
JoinConcurrence
  • Brennan (en)
  • O'Connor (en)
JoinConcurrence/Dissent
  • Brennan, Blackmun (en)
  • Rehnquist, White, Scalia (en)
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 54 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software