• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: asEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transvirtpivot-rulesvirtrdf-labelNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Hindi?Urdu controversy     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:Event100029378, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Type: Thingyago:PsychologicalFeature100023100yago:SpeechAct107160883yago:WikicatPoliticalControversiesyago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntityyago:Abstraction100002137yago:Act100030358yago:Controversy107183151yago:Disagreement107180787yago:Dispute107181935yago:Event100029378 New Facet based on Instances of this Class

The Hindi–Urdu controversy arose in 19th century colonial India out of the debate over whether the Hindi or Urdu languages should be chosen as a national language. Hindi and Urdu are mutually intelligible as spoken languages, to the extent that they are sometimes considered to be dialects or registers of a single spoken language referred to as Hindi-Urdu or sometimes Hindustani. But they are written in very different scripts: Devanagari (for Hindi) and a modified Perso-Arabic script (for Urdu), each of which is completely illegible to readers literate only in the other.