Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court decision. The Court ruled 6–3 that the First Amendment right to free speech was not violated by a Colorado law limiting protest, education, distribution of literature, or counseling within eight feet of a person entering a healthcare facility.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| |
rdfs:comment
| - Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court decision. The Court ruled 6–3 that the First Amendment right to free speech was not violated by a Colorado law limiting protest, education, distribution of literature, or counseling within eight feet of a person entering a healthcare facility. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Hill, et al. v. Colorado, et al. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
Subsequent
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| |
JoinDissent
| |
JoinMajority
| - Rehnquist, O’Connor, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
|
LawsApplied
| |
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| |
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
findlaw
| |
fullname
| - Hill, et al. v. Colorado, et al. (en)
|
Holding
| - A statute limiting protest, education, or distribution of literature or counseling within eight feet of a person entering a health-care facility is constitutional. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| |
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court decision. The Court ruled 6–3 that the First Amendment right to free speech was not violated by a Colorado law limiting protest, education, distribution of literature, or counseling within eight feet of a person entering a healthcare facility. (en)
|
Concurrence
| |
googlescholar
| |
JoinConcurrence
| - O’Connor, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
|
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |