Hartsville Oil Mill v. United States, 271 U.S. 43 (1926), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the jurisdiction of the Court of Claims was not enlarged by Congressional reference legislation when the court already had jurisdiction to hear the case under another section of the Judicial Code. Additionally the court held that modification to the contract in question was not by duress as there had not been an inadequate power in the courts to remedy the effects of the threatened actions.
Attributes | Values |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
rdfs:label |
|
rdfs:comment |
|
foaf:name |
|
dcterms:subject | |
Wikipage page ID |
|
Wikipage revision ID |
|
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage |
|
Link from a Wikipage to an external page | |
sameAs | |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
ParallelCitations |
|
Prior |
|
USPage |
|
USVol |
|
ArgueDate |
|
ArgueYear |
|
case |
|
courtlistener | |
DecideDate |
|
DecideYear |
|
fullname |
|
Holding |
|
justia | |
Litigants |
|
has abstract |
|
ArgueDateB |
|
cornell | |
googlescholar | |
NotParticipating |
|
PerCuriam |
|
prov:wasDerivedFrom | |
page length (characters) of wiki page |
|
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of | |
is Wikipage redirect of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic of |