About: Granholm v. Heald

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Granholm v. Heald Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (2005), was a court case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in a 5–4 decision that ruled that laws in New York and Michigan that permitted in-state wineries to ship wine directly to consumers but prohibited out-of-state wineries from doing the same were unconstitutional. The case was unusual because the arguments centered on the rarely-invoked Twenty-First Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1933, which ended Prohibition in the United States.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label	Granholm v. Heald (en) 그란홀름 대 힐드 사건 (ko)
rdfs:comment	Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (2005), was a court case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in a 5–4 decision that ruled that laws in New York and Michigan that permitted in-state wineries to ship wine directly to consumers but prohibited out-of-state wineries from doing the same were unconstitutional. The case was unusual because the arguments centered on the rarely-invoked Twenty-First Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1933, which ended Prohibition in the United States. (en) 그란홀름 대 힐드 사건(Granholm v. Heald)은 미국 연방대법원의 유명 판례이다. 미시간주와 뉴욕주는 주의 포도주제조자들이 소비자들에게 직접 포도주를 공급할 수 있도록 하였으나 타주 제조자는 이를 제한하였다. 그래서 헌법 내재적 통상조항위반으로 소를 제기하였다. (ko)
foaf:name	(en) Jennifer M. Granholm, Governor of Michigan, et al., Petitioners v. Eleanor Heald, et al.; Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Association, Petitioner v. Eleanor Heald, et al.; Juanita Swedenburg, et al., Petitioners v. Edward D. Kelly, Chairman, New York Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control,State Liquor Authority, et al. (en)
dct:subject	New York (state) wine United States Dormant Commerce Clause case law 2005 in United States case law United States Supreme Court cases Legal history of Michigan Michigan wine United States Constitution Article One case law Alcohol law in the United States United States Twenty-first Amendment case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
Wikipage page ID	1921596 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1110784192 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	New York (state) wine United States Dormant Commerce Clause case law List of United States Supreme Court cases List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 544 United States Congress United States Constitution United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Dormant Commerce Clause Wholesaler 1000000000 (number) 2005 in United States case law United States Supreme Court cases George Pataki Legal history of Michigan Commerce Clause Michigan wine United States Constitution Article One case law Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution Alcohol law in the United States United States Twenty-first Amendment case law Prohibition in the United States United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court Winery Article One of the United States Constitution L. Ed. 2d Supreme Court of the United States Three-tier system (alcohol distribution) Wine Wine shipping laws in the United States Michigan New York (state) Writ of certiorari Wall Street Journal US Supreme Court New York State Liquor Authority F.3d U.S. LEXIS
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.pennjcl.com/issues/vol7/14_comm_Vintage_.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20050413203452/http:/www.law.indiana.edu/webinit/tanford/wine/mihome.html http://www.medill.northwestern.edu/~secure/docket/mt/archives/000867.php
sameAs	Granholm v. Heald Granholm v. Heald Granholm v. Heald Granholm v. Heald Granholm v. Heald
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Citation_needed dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:USArticleI
Dissent	Thomas (en) Stevens (en)
JoinDissent	O'Connor (en) Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor (en)
JoinMajority	Scalia, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
LawsApplied	Dormant Commerce Clause Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
Prior	25920.0 (second)
USPage	460 (xsd:integer)
USVol	544 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-12-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	2004 (xsd:integer)
DecideDate	0001-05-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	2005 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Jennifer M. Granholm, Governor of Michigan, et al., Petitioners v. Eleanor Heald, et al.; Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Association, Petitioner v. Eleanor Heald, et al.; Juanita Swedenburg, et al., Petitioners v. Edward D. Kelly, Chairman, New York Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, State Liquor Authority, et al. (en)
Holding	The 21st Amendment grant of regulatory power to the states over alcoholic beverages does not abrogate the Dormant Commerce Clause. State laws prohibiting direct sales of wine and other alcoholic beverages by out-of-state wineries and other producers and permitting such sales by in-state producers are unconstitutional. Sixth Circuit ruling striking Michigan statute affirmed. (en)
Litigants	Granholm v. Heald (en)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3332 as of Dec 5 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 68 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software