About: Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:SocialGroup107950920, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FGershwin_Publishing_Corp._v._Columbia_Artists_Management%2C_Inc.

Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc., 443 F.2d 1159 (2d Cir. 1971), was a copyright infringement case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Second District ruled that defendant Columbia Artists Management, Inc. was liable for vicarious copyright infringement and contributory copyright infringement. Plaintiff American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers ("ASCAP"), on behalf of Gershwin Publishing Corp., sued Columbia Artists Management, Inc. ("CAMI") on the premise that CAMI had no permission to use a song from its repertory for a public, for-profit concert in which artists managed by CAMI performed. The final court decision established that contributory infringement can still be liable for copyright infringement if the party has knowledge of

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Assembly108163792 yago:Court108329453 yago:Gathering107975026 yago:Group100031264 yago:SocialGroup107950920
rdfs:label	Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc. (en)
rdfs:comment	Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc., 443 F.2d 1159 (2d Cir. 1971), was a copyright infringement case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Second District ruled that defendant Columbia Artists Management, Inc. was liable for vicarious copyright infringement and contributory copyright infringement. Plaintiff American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers ("ASCAP"), on behalf of Gershwin Publishing Corp., sued Columbia Artists Management, Inc. ("CAMI") on the premise that CAMI had no permission to use a song from its repertory for a public, for-profit concert in which artists managed by CAMI performed. The final court decision established that contributory infringement can still be liable for copyright infringement if the party has knowledge of (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	Town of North Hempstead, New York United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit cases United States lawsuits United States copyright case law 1971 in United States case law ASCAP
Wikipage page ID	29426828 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1088197655 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Robert P. Anderson F.2d List of copyright case law Bess, You Is My Woman Now United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Town of North Hempstead, New York United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit cases United States lawsuits Copyright Act of 1909 Copyright infringement Columbia Artists Management Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Redd Horne, Inc. Compensating differential Tim Wu Todd Duncan American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers United States copyright case law 1971 in United States case law Henry Friendly ASCAP Test case Port Washington, New York Camilla Williams Vicarious liability Summary judgement S.D.N.Y. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit A.L.R. Fed. Contributory liability F. Supp. U.S.P.Q.
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/297181/gershwin-publishing-corporation-v-columbia-artists-management-inc-and/ https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/133 http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.pdf https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/443/1159/246268/ https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/312/581/1468873/ https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=13919786496570065695
sameAs	Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc. Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc. Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc. Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc.
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Italic_title dbt:Reflist dbt:Infobox_U.S._Courts_of_Appeals_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit.svg?width=300
LawsApplied	Copyright Act of 1909
Prior	312 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-04-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	1971 (xsd:integer)
case	17280.0 (second)
citations	17280.0 (second)
court	United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/297181/gershwin-publishing-corporation-v-columbia-artists-management-inc-and/
CourtSeal	Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.svg (en)
DecideDate	0001-05-24 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1971 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc. (en)
Holding	The court established that defendant CAMI could not avoid paying license fees when music in plaintiff ASCAP's catalogue is performed at concerts, even when such events are sponsored by local organizations rather than directly by CAMI itself. Southern District of New York affirmed. (en)
judges	Henry Friendly, Chief Judge, Robert P. Anderson, Circuit Judge, Levet, District Judge (en)
justia	https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/443/1159/246268/
Litigants	Gershwin Publishing Corporation, Columbia Artists Management Inc. (en)
majority	Judge Robert P. Anderson (en)
has abstract	Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc., 443 F.2d 1159 (2d Cir. 1971), was a copyright infringement case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Second District ruled that defendant Columbia Artists Management, Inc. was liable for vicarious copyright infringement and contributory copyright infringement. Plaintiff American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers ("ASCAP"), on behalf of Gershwin Publishing Corp., sued Columbia Artists Management, Inc. ("CAMI") on the premise that CAMI had no permission to use a song from its repertory for a public, for-profit concert in which artists managed by CAMI performed. The final court decision established that contributory infringement can still be liable for copyright infringement if the party has knowledge of the violating activity, whether or not they are directly involved in the violation. (en)
googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=13919786496570065695
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Gershwin_Publishing_Corp._v._Columbia_Artists_Management,_Inc.?oldid=1088197655&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	14485 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Gershwin_Publishing_Corp._v._Columbia_Artists_Management,_Inc.
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Contributory copyright infringement Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management Gershwin Publ'g Corp. v. Columbia Artists Mgmt. Gershwin Publ’g Corp. v. Columbia Artists Mgmt. Gershwin v. Columbia
is Wikipage redirect of	Gershwin Publishing Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management Gershwin Publ'g Corp. v. Columbia Artists Mgmt. Gershwin Publ’g Corp. v. Columbia Artists Mgmt. Gershwin v. Columbia
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Gershwin_Publishing_Corp._v._Columbia_Artists_Management,_Inc.

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 54 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software