Article IV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution, the Full Faith and Credit Clause, addresses the duty that states within the United States have to respect the "public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state." According to the Supreme Court, there is a difference between the credit owed to laws (i.e. legislative measures and common law) as compared to the credit owed to judgments. Judges and lawyers agree on the meaning of the clause with respect to the recognition of judgments rendered by one state in the courts of another. Barring exceptional circumstances, one state must enforce a judgment by a court in another, unless that court lacked jurisdiction, even if the enforcing court otherwise disagrees with the result. At present, it is widely agreed that this Cla
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Full Faith and Credit Clause (fr)
- Full Faith and Credit Clause (en)
- 충분한 신뢰와 신용 (ko)
|
| rdfs:comment
| - La Full Faith and Credit Clause est le nom généralement donné à la section 1 de l'article IV de la Constitution des États-Unis d'Amérique. Elle traite du devoir que les États composant les États-Unis ont de respecter « les actes publics, les registres et les procédures judiciaires de chacun des autres États ». Selon la Cour suprême des États-Unis, il existe une différence entre le crédit accordé aux lois (c'est-à-dire les décisions législatives ainsi que la common law) et celui dû aux jugements. Les jugements se voient généralement reconnaître un respect plus grand que les lois, dans les autres États. (fr)
- 충분한 신뢰와 신용이란 미국 헌법 제4조의 원리로 다른 주의 공공행위, 기록, 법적 절차를 주에서 존중하는 연방주의상 원리이다. 예를 들어 X주에서 채무자를 상대로 승소한 갑은 채무자의 재산이 있는 Y주에서 X주 법원의 집행문을 가지고 X주에서 강제집행할 수 있는 것이다. 이는 X주가 Y주의 재판결과를 존중하기 때문이다. 충분한 신뢰와 신용원칙은 타른 주법원이 잘못된 법조를 적용하여 잘못된 판결을 내린 경우에도 소수의 예외를 제외하고는 존중되어야 한다고 본다. (ko)
- Article IV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution, the Full Faith and Credit Clause, addresses the duty that states within the United States have to respect the "public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state." According to the Supreme Court, there is a difference between the credit owed to laws (i.e. legislative measures and common law) as compared to the credit owed to judgments. Judges and lawyers agree on the meaning of the clause with respect to the recognition of judgments rendered by one state in the courts of another. Barring exceptional circumstances, one state must enforce a judgment by a court in another, unless that court lacked jurisdiction, even if the enforcing court otherwise disagrees with the result. At present, it is widely agreed that this Cla (en)
|
| foaf:depiction
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Wikipage page ID
| |
| Wikipage revision ID
| |
| Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
| Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
| sameAs
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| thumbnail
| |
| has abstract
| - Article IV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution, the Full Faith and Credit Clause, addresses the duty that states within the United States have to respect the "public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state." According to the Supreme Court, there is a difference between the credit owed to laws (i.e. legislative measures and common law) as compared to the credit owed to judgments. Judges and lawyers agree on the meaning of the clause with respect to the recognition of judgments rendered by one state in the courts of another. Barring exceptional circumstances, one state must enforce a judgment by a court in another, unless that court lacked jurisdiction, even if the enforcing court otherwise disagrees with the result. At present, it is widely agreed that this Clause of the Constitution has a minimal impact on a court's choice of law decision provided that no state’s sovereignty is infringed, although this Clause of the Constitution was once interpreted to have greater impact. (en)
- La Full Faith and Credit Clause est le nom généralement donné à la section 1 de l'article IV de la Constitution des États-Unis d'Amérique. Elle traite du devoir que les États composant les États-Unis ont de respecter « les actes publics, les registres et les procédures judiciaires de chacun des autres États ». Selon la Cour suprême des États-Unis, il existe une différence entre le crédit accordé aux lois (c'est-à-dire les décisions législatives ainsi que la common law) et celui dû aux jugements. Les jugements se voient généralement reconnaître un respect plus grand que les lois, dans les autres États. (fr)
- 충분한 신뢰와 신용이란 미국 헌법 제4조의 원리로 다른 주의 공공행위, 기록, 법적 절차를 주에서 존중하는 연방주의상 원리이다. 예를 들어 X주에서 채무자를 상대로 승소한 갑은 채무자의 재산이 있는 Y주에서 X주 법원의 집행문을 가지고 X주에서 강제집행할 수 있는 것이다. 이는 X주가 Y주의 재판결과를 존중하기 때문이다. 충분한 신뢰와 신용원칙은 타른 주법원이 잘못된 법조를 적용하여 잘못된 판결을 내린 경우에도 소수의 예외를 제외하고는 존중되어야 한다고 본다. (ko)
|
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)