Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, holding that the law enhancing the sentence for identity theft requires proof that an individual knew that the identity card or number he had used belonged to another, actual person. Simply using a Social Security Number is not sufficient connection to another individual.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Flores-Figueroa v. United States (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, holding that the law enhancing the sentence for identity theft requires proof that an individual knew that the identity card or number he had used belonged to another, actual person. Simply using a Social Security Number is not sufficient connection to another individual. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Ignacio Carlos Flores-Figueroa, Petitioner v. United States (en)
|
dct:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
docket
| |
JoinMajority
| - Roberts, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg (en)
|
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| - Defendant convicted ; affirmed, 274 F. App'x 501 ; cert. granted, . (en)
|
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (en)
|
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
findlaw
| |
fullname
| - Ignacio Carlos Flores-Figueroa, Petitioner v. United States (en)
|
Holding
| - The "knowingly" requirement for the federal crime of aggravated identify theft requires that the defendant knew that the false identification he used actually belonged to another person. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - Flores-Figueroa v. United States (en)
|
majority
| |
has abstract
| - Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, holding that the law enhancing the sentence for identity theft requires proof that an individual knew that the identity card or number he had used belonged to another, actual person. Simply using a Social Security Number is not sufficient connection to another individual. (en)
|
Concurrence
| |
cornell
| |