About: Flores-Figueroa v. United States     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FFlores-Figueroa_v._United_States

Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, holding that the law enhancing the sentence for identity theft requires proof that an individual knew that the identity card or number he had used belonged to another, actual person. Simply using a Social Security Number is not sufficient connection to another individual.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Flores-Figueroa v. United States
rdfs:comment
  • Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, holding that the law enhancing the sentence for identity theft requires proof that an individual knew that the identity card or number he had used belonged to another, actual person. Simply using a Social Security Number is not sufficient connection to another individual.
foaf:name
  • Ignacio Carlos Flores-Figueroa, Petitioner v. United States
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
dct:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
ArgueDate
  • --02-25
ArgueYear
case
  • Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646
courtlistener
DecideDate
  • --05-04
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
  • Ignacio Carlos Flores-Figueroa, Petitioner v. United States
Holding
  • The "knowingly" requirement for the federal crime of aggravated identify theft requires that the defendant knew that the false identification he used actually belonged to another person.
justia
Litigants
  • Flores-Figueroa v. United States
majority
  • Breyer
Concurrence
  • Scalia
  • Alito
cornell
googlescholar
JoinConcurrence
  • Thomas
has abstract
  • Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, holding that the law enhancing the sentence for identity theft requires proof that an individual knew that the identity card or number he had used belonged to another, actual person. Simply using a Social Security Number is not sufficient connection to another individual.
Docket
JoinMajority
  • Roberts, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg
oyez
ParallelCitations
  • 172800.0
Prior
  • Defendant convicted ; affirmed, 274 F. App'x 501 ; cert. granted, .
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git51 as of Sep 16 2020


Alternative Linked Data Documents: PivotViewer | ODE     Content Formats:       RDF       ODATA       Microdata      About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3319 as of Dec 29 2020, on Linux (x86_64-centos_6-linux-glibc2.12), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2021 OpenLink Software