Falcis III v. Civil Registrar-General (G.R. No. 217910) was a case which arose out of a petition filed by Filipino lawyer Jesus Falcis III before the Supreme Court of the Philippines. The Court promulgated its ruling on September 3, 2019. The high court was asked about the constitutionality of the provision of the Family Code of the Philippines defining marriage as "between a man and a woman".
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdfs:label
| - Falcis III v. Civil Registrar-General (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Falcis III v. Civil Registrar-General (G.R. No. 217910) was a case which arose out of a petition filed by Filipino lawyer Jesus Falcis III before the Supreme Court of the Philippines. The Court promulgated its ruling on September 3, 2019. The high court was asked about the constitutionality of the provision of the Family Code of the Philippines defining marriage as "between a man and a woman". (en)
|
name
| - Falcis III v. Civil Registrar-General (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
LawsApplied
| |
citations
| |
court
| |
full name
| - Jesus Nicardo M. Falcis III v. Civil Registrar-General (en)
|
Holding
| - for hurting the case of his clients by not first filing a marriage petition on their behalf, which, when rejected, would have created an actual controversy. (en)
- 5000.0 (philippinePeso)
- The petition was dismissed for bringing no actual controversy. Falcis III found guilty of indirect contempt of court and ordered to pay a fine of (en)
|
keywords
| |
has abstract
| - Falcis III v. Civil Registrar-General (G.R. No. 217910) was a case which arose out of a petition filed by Filipino lawyer Jesus Falcis III before the Supreme Court of the Philippines. The Court promulgated its ruling on September 3, 2019. The high court was asked about the constitutionality of the provision of the Family Code of the Philippines defining marriage as "between a man and a woman". (en)
|
Concurrence
| |
date decided
| |
decision by
| - Marvic Leonen, joined by Antonio Carpio, Presbitero Velasco Jr., Teresita Leonardo-De Castro, Lucas Bersamin, Mariano del Castillo, Estela Perlas Bernabe, Marvic Leonen, Samuel Martires, Noel Tijam, Andres Reyes Jr., Alexander Gesmundo (en)
|
number of judges
| |
prior actions
| - None, Supreme Court was first instance (en)
|
QuestionsPresented
| - Constitutionality of the portions of Article 1 and 2 of the Family Code of the Philippines, which defines marriage as between a man and a woman, and whether said articles violate the equal protection and due process provisions of the , , and religious freedom of the petitioner. (en)
|
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |