FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000), is an important United States Supreme Court case in the development of American administrative law. It ruled that the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act did not give the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the authority to regulate tobacco products as "drugs" or "devices." This was later superseded by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, which granted the FDA the authority to regulate such products.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. (en)
- FDA contro Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. (it)
|
rdfs:comment
| - FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000), is an important United States Supreme Court case in the development of American administrative law. It ruled that the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act did not give the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the authority to regulate tobacco products as "drugs" or "devices." This was later superseded by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, which granted the FDA the authority to regulate such products. (en)
- Il processo noto come FDA contro Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000), è un importante caso della Corte suprema degli Stati Uniti d'America che ha costituito un'importante pietra miliare nello sviluppo del . Come esito di tale processo, il 21 marzo 2000 la Corte suprema sentenziò che la legge denominata non dava alla Food and Drug Administration (FDA) l'autorità per regolamentare i prodotti del tabacco come "drugs" o "devices", ossia come "medicinali" o "apparecchiature" (medicali). Tale sentenza fu in seguito resa obsoleta dalla legge denominata , che garantì invece espressamente alla FDA l'autorità per regolamentare tali prodotti. (it)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Food and Drug Administration, et al. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., et al. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
superseded
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| |
JoinDissent
| - Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg (en)
|
JoinMajority
| - Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas (en)
|
LawsApplied
| |
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., (en)
|
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - Food and Drug Administration, et al. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., et al. (en)
|
Holding
| - The Food and Drug Administration has no authority to regulate tobacco products. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. (en)
|
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000), is an important United States Supreme Court case in the development of American administrative law. It ruled that the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act did not give the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the authority to regulate tobacco products as "drugs" or "devices." This was later superseded by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, which granted the FDA the authority to regulate such products. (en)
- Il processo noto come FDA contro Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000), è un importante caso della Corte suprema degli Stati Uniti d'America che ha costituito un'importante pietra miliare nello sviluppo del . Come esito di tale processo, il 21 marzo 2000 la Corte suprema sentenziò che la legge denominata non dava alla Food and Drug Administration (FDA) l'autorità per regolamentare i prodotti del tabacco come "drugs" o "devices", ossia come "medicinali" o "apparecchiature" (medicali). Tale sentenza fu in seguito resa obsoleta dalla legge denominata , che garantì invece espressamente alla FDA l'autorità per regolamentare tali prodotti. (it)
|
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |