Ewing v. Goldstein 15 Cal. Rptr. 3d 864 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004) is a landmark court case that extended California mental health professional's duty to protect identifiable victims of potentially violent persons, as established by Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, to include acting upon communications from third parties that indicate a possible threat.
Attributes | Values |
---|---|
rdfs:label |
|
rdfs:comment |
|
name |
|
foaf:depiction | |
dct:subject | |
Wikipage page ID |
|
Wikipage revision ID |
|
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage |
|
Link from a Wikipage to an external page | |
sameAs | |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
thumbnail | |
case |
|
citations |
|
court | |
findlaw | |
full name |
|
judges |
|
keywords | |
other source |
|
other url | |
has abstract |
|
concurring |
|
date decided |
|
decision by |
|
number of judges |
|
prov:wasDerivedFrom | |
page length (characters) of wiki page |
|
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of | |
is Wikipage disambiguates of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic of |