About: Eldred v. Ashcroft

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Eldred v. Ashcroft Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FEldred_v._Ashcroft&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org

Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186 (2003), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States upholding the constitutionality of the 1998 Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act (CTEA). The practical result of this was to prevent a number of works from entering the public domain in 1998 and following years, as would have occurred under the Copyright Act of 1976. Materials which the plaintiffs had worked with and were ready to republish were now unavailable due to copyright restrictions.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatTrialsInTheUnitedStates yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Act100030358 yago:Activity100407535 yago:Attempt100786195 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case yago:Test100791078 umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label	Eldred v. Ashcroft (en) Eldred contra Ashcroft (ca) Caso Eldred contra Ashcroft (es) 엘드리드 대 애시크로프트 사건 (ko) 埃尔德雷德诉阿什克罗夫特案 (zh)
rdfs:comment	El caso Eldred contra Ashcroft es un litigio sobre Derecho constitucional que tuvo lugar en Estados Unidos en el año 2003, y en el que se valoró la constitucionalidad de la Ley de Extensión de la Duración del Copyright (CTEA, por sus siglas en inglés), promulgada en 1998. Tras varias instancias judiciales, el caso llegó hasta la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos, que estimó que la ley era constitucional en una decisión con siete votos a favor y dos en contra. (es) 埃尔德雷德诉阿什克罗夫特案（Eldred v. Ashcroft），537 U.S. 186 (2003)，是一起诉至美国最高法院的版权案件。最高法院最终以7-2的多数认可了1998年版权年限延长法案（Copyright Term Extension Act, CTEA）的合宪性。依据该判决，与1976年版权法修订延长保护期的结果类似，大量本应于1998年或其后若干年失去版权保护的作品得以延缓进入公有领域，原告原本所依托并准备重制的作品将因版权限制而无法发行。 (zh) Eldred contra Ashcroft va ser una decisió del Tribunal Suprem dels Estats Units que va confirmar la constitucionalitat de la (CTEA) de 1998 amb el resultat d'evitar que diverses obres entressin al domini públic el 1998 i els anys següents, tal com s'hauria produït en virtut de la . Els materials amb els quals havien treballat els demandants i que estaven disposats a publicar-los ja no estaven disponibles. a restriccions de copyright. (ca) Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186 (2003), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States upholding the constitutionality of the 1998 Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act (CTEA). The practical result of this was to prevent a number of works from entering the public domain in 1998 and following years, as would have occurred under the Copyright Act of 1976. Materials which the plaintiffs had worked with and were ready to republish were now unavailable due to copyright restrictions. (en) 엘드리드 대(對) 애시크로프트(Eldred vs Reno)는 미국 재판에서의 특정 사건으로 엘드리치 출판사의 엘드리드와 애시크로프트라는 법무부장관의 이름을 따서 붙여진 사건의 이름이다. 엘드리치는 개인적으로 온라인 상으로 저작권이 만료된 작품을 공개하는 일을 하고 있었다. 기존의 저작권 보호법이 저작자의 생존 기간과 사망 후 50년간으로 규정되어 있었는데, 엘드리치는 이렇게 저작권이 만료된 작품들을 세상 사람들이 자유롭게 이용할 수 있도록 공개하는 일을 하고 있었다. 그런데, 저작권으로 이익을 보는 관계자의 입장에서는 이것이 못내 내키지 않는 부분이었다. 가급적 저작권이 오래 지속되면서 보다 많은 수익을 보장하고 싶은 욕심이 들었다. 그래서 사람의 수명이 연장되면서 저작권 보호법도 사망 후 70년으로 20년을 더 연장하는 '저작권 기간 연장법' 이 등장하게 되었다. (ko)
foaf:name	(en) Eric Eldred, et al. v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	2003 in United States case law Public domain in the United States United States Supreme Court cases Copyright Clause case law Copyright term United States Constitution Article One case law United States Free Speech Clause case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
Wikipage page ID	41534 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1115118938 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	American Association of Law Libraries Amicus curiae 2003 in United States case law Public domain in the United States Public trust En banc Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enters. John Paul Stevens Bureau of National Affairs United States Attorney General United States Congress United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit United States District Court for the District of Columbia United States constitutional law United States copyright law United States government United States v. Lopez United States v. Morrison Uruguay Round Agreements Act Internet United States Supreme Court cases Copyright Act of 1790 Copyright Act of 1909 Copyright Act of 1976 Copyright Term Extension Act Ruth Bader Ginsburg Free Software Foundation Golan v. Holder Motion Picture Association of America Copyright Clause case law Copyright term Copyright Copyright Act of 1831 Copyright Clause Copyright term Theodore Olson Eric Eldred Stephen Breyer Public Domain Enhancement Act Public domain United States Constitution Article One case law William Rehnquist Lawyers' Edition ASCAP United States Free Speech Clause case law Fair use Federal Supplement First Amendment to the United States Constitution Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Brief (law) Berkman Center for Internet and Society Kahle v. Gonzales Free culture movement Quid pro quo United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court Janet Reno John Ashcroft June Lazenby Green

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 54 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software