About: Deckmyn v Vandersteen

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Deckmyn v Vandersteen Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FDeckmyn_v_Vandersteen

Johan Deckmyn and Vrijheidsfonds VZW vs Helena Vandersteen, Christiane Vandersteen, Liliana Vandersteen, Isabelle Vandersteen, Rita Dupont, Amoras II CVOH and WPG Uitgevers België is a preliminary ruling by the European Court of Justice. The reference concerned what conditions must be met for a derivative work to be considered a parody. Parodies are allowed under the Information Society Directive, in those countries that have indicated to apply the parody exception. The European Court of Justice indicated that the definition of the copyright exceptions was consistent throughout the EU (and given "an autonomous meaning" within the directive) and that to qualify the work must "evoke an existing work, while being noticeably different from it, and secondly, to constitute an expression of humou

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	work yago:WikicatParodies yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Caricature106780069 yago:Case107308889 yago:Communication100033020 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:Message106598915 yago:Parody106780309 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Wit106776138 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label	Deckmyn v Vandersteen (en)
rdfs:comment	Johan Deckmyn and Vrijheidsfonds VZW vs Helena Vandersteen, Christiane Vandersteen, Liliana Vandersteen, Isabelle Vandersteen, Rita Dupont, Amoras II CVOH and WPG Uitgevers België is a preliminary ruling by the European Court of Justice. The reference concerned what conditions must be met for a derivative work to be considered a parody. Parodies are allowed under the Information Society Directive, in those countries that have indicated to apply the parody exception. The European Court of Justice indicated that the definition of the copyright exceptions was consistent throughout the EU (and given "an autonomous meaning" within the directive) and that to qualify the work must "evoke an existing work, while being noticeably different from it, and secondly, to constitute an expression of humou (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	Spike and Suzy Parodies of comics 2014 in case law Comics involved in plagiarism controversies Political controversies in Belgium Court of Justice of the European Union case law Copyright case law
Wikipage page ID	42947187 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1073110588 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Precedent Parody Vlaams Belang Spike and Suzy Derivative work Spike and Suzy Ghent Parodies of comics Willy Vandersteen Preliminary ruling 2014 in case law Daniël Termont Dutch language European Commission European Court of Justice Comics involved in plagiarism controversies List of European Court of Justice rulings Political controversies in Belgium Court of appeal (Belgium) Association without lucrative purpose Court of Justice of the European Union case law Advocate General Copyright case law Information Society Directive Preliminary injunction Tribunal of first instance (Belgium) Kingdom of Belgium dbr:Cruz_Villalón
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.ie-forum.nl/backoffice/uploads/file/IEForum/IE-Forum%20(be)%20Hof%20van%20Beroep%20Brussel%208%20april%202013,%20Nr_%202011_AR_914%20&%202011_AR_915%20(Johan%20Deckmyn%20tegen%20Vandersteen%20c_s_%20-%20Vrijheidsfonds%20VZW%20tegen%20Vandersteen%20c_s_).pdf http://curia.europa.eu/juris/celex.jsf%3Fcelex=62013CC0201&lang1=en&type=TXT&ancre= http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf%3Ftext=&docid=138426&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=318356
sameAs	Deckmyn v Vandersteen Deckmyn v Vandersteen Deckmyn v Vandersteen Deckmyn v Vandersteen
SubmitDate	0001-04-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
SubmitYear	2013 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Dts dbt:EngvarB dbt:Italic_title dbt:Multiple_image dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:ECLI dbt:Infobox_European_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/SpikeandSuzycover.png?width=300
align	right (en)
chamber	Full chamber (en)
court	ECJ (en)
DecideDate	0001-12-03 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	2014 (xsd:integer)
direction	horizontal (en)
footer	Original cover of Spike and Suzy and the version of Deckmyn (en)
fullname	Johan Deckmyn and Vrijheidsfonds VZW vs Helena Vandersteen, Christiane Vandersteen, Liliana Vandersteen, Isabelle Vandersteen, Rita Dupont, Amoras II CVOH and WPG Uitgevers België (en)
image	Deckmyn_as_lambic.png (en) SpikeandSuzycover.png (en)
keywords	definition of parody in the Information Society Directive (en)
language	Dutch language
nationality	Belgium (en)
width	155 (xsd:integer) 180 (xsd:integer)
has abstract	Johan Deckmyn and Vrijheidsfonds VZW vs Helena Vandersteen, Christiane Vandersteen, Liliana Vandersteen, Isabelle Vandersteen, Rita Dupont, Amoras II CVOH and WPG Uitgevers België is a preliminary ruling by the European Court of Justice. The reference concerned what conditions must be met for a derivative work to be considered a parody. Parodies are allowed under the Information Society Directive, in those countries that have indicated to apply the parody exception. The European Court of Justice indicated that the definition of the copyright exceptions was consistent throughout the EU (and given "an autonomous meaning" within the directive) and that to qualify the work must "evoke an existing work, while being noticeably different from it, and secondly, to constitute an expression of humour or mockery". The humour or mockery does not need to be directed towards the work itself, but it can also be mockery of something/someone else. When considering a parody-case the court should strike a fair balance between the rights of the rights holders of the original work, as the maker of the parody. The ruling was requested by the court of appeal (Dutch: hof van beroep) of Brussels (Belgium) in a case of Vlaams Belang politician Johan Deckmyn who had copied a cover of Spike and Suzy (Dutch: Suske en Wiske), in which he had positioned Daniël Termont, the mayor of Ghent. The rights holders of the comic had sued Deckmyn for copyright infringement. Because the interpretation of EU law was involved in the case, the Belgian court made the reference. (en)
AdvocateGeneral	P. Cruz Villalón (en)
CaseNumber	C‑201/13 (en)
CaseType	Reference for a preliminary ruling (en)
CelexID	62013 (xsd:integer)
ECLI	7251692.0 (second)
InstrumentsCited	Information Society Directive
judge	A. Borg Barthet (en) A. Rosas (en) G. Arestis (en) K. Lenaerts (en) L. Bay Larsen (en) C. Vajda (en)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 53 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software