• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Dawkins' God     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Book_CW, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Type: Thingbibo:Bookschema:Bookschema:CreativeWorkworkText (literary theory)wikidata:Q386724Bookyago:WikicatBooksByAlisterMcGrathyago:Artifact100021939yago:Book106410904yago:Creation103129123yago:Object100002684yago:PhysicalEntity100001930yago:Product104007894yago:Publication106589574yago:WikicatIrishNon-fictionBooksyago:Work104599396bookwritten workyago:Whole100003553yago:Wikicat2004Booksyago:WikicatReligiousStudiesBooksumbel-rc:Book_CW New Facet based on Instances of this Class

Dawkins' God: Genes, Memes, and the Meaning of Life is a book by Alister McGrath, a theologian who is currently Professor of Historical Theology at Oxford University. The book, published in 2004, with a second edition in 2015, aims to refute claims about religion made by another well-known professor at Oxford, Richard Dawkins. McGrath's book does not seek to demonstrate how Dawkins’ claims differ from Christianity, rather, it argues that Dawkins' arguments fall far short of the logical and evidence-based reasoning that Dawkins himself espouses.