About: Cybersell, Inc. v. Cybersell, Inc.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Cybersell, Inc. v. Cybersell, Inc. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FCybersell%2C_Inc._v._Cybersell%2C_Inc.

Cybersell, Inc. v. Cybersell, Inc. was a trademark infringement case based on the use of an internet service mark. The United States District Court for the District of Arizona was asked to review whether the allegedly infringing use of a service mark in a home page on the World Wide Web suffices for personal jurisdiction in the state where the holder of the mark has its principal place of business. The Cybersell holding illustrated that passive websites (i.e. sites that serve only to publish information, rather than to engage in commercial activity or collect information from a user) do not establish personal jurisdiction outside the state in which they are based.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label	Cybersell, Inc. v. Cybersell, Inc. (en)
rdfs:comment	Cybersell, Inc. v. Cybersell, Inc. was a trademark infringement case based on the use of an internet service mark. The United States District Court for the District of Arizona was asked to review whether the allegedly infringing use of a service mark in a home page on the World Wide Web suffices for personal jurisdiction in the state where the holder of the mark has its principal place of business. The Cybersell holding illustrated that passive websites (i.e. sites that serve only to publish information, rather than to engage in commercial activity or collect information from a user) do not establish personal jurisdiction outside the state in which they are based. (en)
name	Cybersell, Inc. v. Cybersell, Inc. (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	United States Internet case law United States trademark case law United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit cases 1997 in United States case law
Wikipage page ID	26521794 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1105109491 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Harlington Wood, Jr. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit United States District Court for the District of Arizona Personal jurisdiction in internet cases in the United States United States Internet case law United States trademark case law Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King Personal jurisdiction United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit cases 1997 in United States case law Minimum contacts A. Wallace Tashima Pamela Ann Rymer Laurence Canter and Martha Siegel Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act Service mark Personal jurisdiction in Internet cases in the United States Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc. Purposeful availment
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://library.findlaw.com/1998/Apr/1/127403.html http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/ilaw/Jurisdiction/Cybersell_Sum.html
sameAs	Cybersell, Inc. v. Cybersell, Inc. Cybersell, Inc. v. Cybersell, Inc. Cybersell, Inc. v. Cybersell, Inc.
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Citation_needed dbt:Reflist dbt:Infobox_Court_Case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_States_Courts,_Ninth_Judicial_Circuit.svg?width=300
citations	25920.0 (second)
court	United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Holding	The order granting Cybersell FL's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction was affirmed because appellees' use of a webpage name was passive and did not constitute commercial activity within the state; appellees had not purposefully availed themselves such that they could expect to be subject to the court's jurisdiction. (en)
judges	Harlington Wood, Jr. A. Wallace Tashima Pamela Ann Rymer
keywords	Personal jurisdiction in internet cases in the United States Personal jurisdiction
has abstract	Cybersell, Inc. v. Cybersell, Inc. was a trademark infringement case based on the use of an internet service mark. The United States District Court for the District of Arizona was asked to review whether the allegedly infringing use of a service mark in a home page on the World Wide Web suffices for personal jurisdiction in the state where the holder of the mark has its principal place of business. The Cybersell holding illustrated that passive websites (i.e. sites that serve only to publish information, rather than to engage in commercial activity or collect information from a user) do not establish personal jurisdiction outside the state in which they are based. (en)
date decided	Dec. 2, 1997 (en)
prior actions	United States District Court for the District of Arizona granted the defendant's motion for dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction. (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Cybersell,_Inc._v._Cybersell,_Inc.?oldid=1105109491&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	10359 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Cybersell,_Inc._v._Cybersell,_Inc.
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	CompuServe, Inc. v. Patterson Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Technologies, Inc. Laurence Canter and Martha Siegel Boschetto v. Hansing Personal jurisdiction in Internet cases in the United States
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Cybersell,_Inc._v._Cybersell,_Inc.

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 50 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software