About: Criticism of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatEnvironmentalControversies, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FCriticism_of_the_IPCC_Fourth_Assessment_Report

The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) is a report on climate change created with the help of a large number of contributors, both scientists and governmental representatives. There has been considerable political controversy over a small number of errors found in the report, and there have been calls for review of the process used to formulate the report. The overwhelming majority view of scientists with expertise in climate change is that errors, when found, are corrected, and the issues as identified do not undermine the conclusions of the report that the climate system is warming in response to increased levels of greenhouse gases, largely due to human activities.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Criticism of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (en)
  • Glaciergate (pl)
  • 冰川消融之争 (zh)
rdfs:comment
  • The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) is a report on climate change created with the help of a large number of contributors, both scientists and governmental representatives. There has been considerable political controversy over a small number of errors found in the report, and there have been calls for review of the process used to formulate the report. The overwhelming majority view of scientists with expertise in climate change is that errors, when found, are corrected, and the issues as identified do not undermine the conclusions of the report that the climate system is warming in response to increased levels of greenhouse gases, largely due to human activities. (en)
  • 冰川消融之争或冰川争吵是指2010年1月爆发的关于喜马拉雅冰川将在2035年消失的说法的争论。这个争议起源于聯合國政府間氣候變化專門委員會的2007年报告预测喜马拉雅冰川到2035年可能由于气候变化而消失。这项预测是建立在一位科学家与一位记者的谈话上的,而后者如今把它称为“猜测”。 (zh)
  • Glaciergate – nazwa dotycząca nieprawidłowości przy ocenie postępu topnienia lodowców w Himalajach oraz związanej z nimi procedury naukowej w IV Raporcie Międzyrządowego Zespołu do spraw Zmian Klimatu. Błędy zostały wskazane pod koniec 2009 roku. Rozdział był pisany przez 25 autorów pod kierunkiem , które obecnie pracuje w Imperial College London oraz (argentyński meteorolog). Autorami, którzy koordynowali pracę nad rozdziałem, byli , , oraz Wu Shaohong. Człon gate w nazwie glaciergate, jest nawiązaniem do afery Watergate, "glacier" to w języku angielskim lodowiec. (pl)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 46 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software