Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385 (1926), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court expanded and established key constructs of the Fourteenth Amendment's due process doctrine along with establishing the vagueness doctrine. It defined necessary requirements that are fundamental to any law, which, when lacking, are to be deemed void. The case was a dispute regarding Oklahoma state statutes, which, in essence vaguely required businesses to pay workers not less than the "current rate of per diem wages in the locality where the work is performed". The ruling determined that the standards set in place were unconstitutionally vague.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Connally v. General Construction Co. (en)
- Connally contro General Construction Co. (it)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385 (1926), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court expanded and established key constructs of the Fourteenth Amendment's due process doctrine along with establishing the vagueness doctrine. It defined necessary requirements that are fundamental to any law, which, when lacking, are to be deemed void. The case was a dispute regarding Oklahoma state statutes, which, in essence vaguely required businesses to pay workers not less than the "current rate of per diem wages in the locality where the work is performed". The ruling determined that the standards set in place were unconstitutionally vague. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Connally, Commissioner, et. al. v. General Construction Company (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| - Van Devanter, McReynolds, Butler (en)
|
JoinMajority
| - Taft, Holmes, Stone, Brandeis, Sanford (en)
|
LawsApplied
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - Connally v. General Construction Co., (en)
|
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - Connally, Commissioner, et. al. v. General Construction Company (en)
|
Holding
| - The court ruled that the provisions in question were void for unconstitutional vagueness. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - Connally v. General Construction Co. (en)
|
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385 (1926), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court expanded and established key constructs of the Fourteenth Amendment's due process doctrine along with establishing the vagueness doctrine. It defined necessary requirements that are fundamental to any law, which, when lacking, are to be deemed void. The case was a dispute regarding Oklahoma state statutes, which, in essence vaguely required businesses to pay workers not less than the "current rate of per diem wages in the locality where the work is performed". The ruling determined that the standards set in place were unconstitutionally vague. (en)
|
ArgueDateA
| |
ArgueDateB
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is Wikipage disambiguates
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |