About: Carter v. Kentucky     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FCarter_v._Kentucky

Carter v. Kentucky was a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that trial judges in criminal proceedings must, upon proper request of the defendant, inform the jury of his right against self-incrimination, and that its execution may not be used against him.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Carter v. Kentucky (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Carter v. Kentucky was a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that trial judges in criminal proceedings must, upon proper request of the defendant, inform the jury of his right against self-incrimination, and that its execution may not be used against him. (en)
foaf:name
  • Lonnie Joe Carter v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
Dissent
  • Rehnquist (en)
docket
JoinMajority
  • Burger, Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, Stevens (en)
LawsApplied
  • The Fifth Amendment (en)
Prior
  • * Christian County Circuit Court * Kentucky Supreme Court * U.S. Supreme Court (en)
USPage
USVol
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
  • Lonnie Joe Carter v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (en)
Holding
  • 𝗬𝗲𝘀. A criminal trial Judge must inform the jury that "the [defendant] is not compelled to testify and the fact that he does not cannot be used as an inference of guilt and should not prejudice him in any way" at the request of the defendant. The Supreme Court of Kentucky is reversed. (en)
Litigants
  • Carter vs. Kentucky (en)
majority
  • Stewart (en)
has abstract
  • Carter v. Kentucky was a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that trial judges in criminal proceedings must, upon proper request of the defendant, inform the jury of his right against self-incrimination, and that its execution may not be used against him. (en)
Concurrence
  • Powell (en)
  • Stevens (en)
JoinConcurrence
  • Brennan (en)
QuestionsPresented
  • Is a trial Judge required to inform the Jury of his privilege against self-incrimination? (en)
SCOTUS
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is Wikipage redirect of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 60 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software