About: Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co., 282 U.S. 359 (1931), was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court dealing with accounting for purposes of federal income tax and the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The case held that an annual accounting system is a practical necessity if the federal income tax is to produce revenue ascertainable and payable at regular intervals.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.
rdfs:comment
  • Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co., 282 U.S. 359 (1931), was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court dealing with accounting for purposes of federal income tax and the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The case held that an annual accounting system is a practical necessity if the federal income tax is to produce revenue ascertainable and payable at regular intervals.
foaf:name
  • Burnet, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, v. Sanford & Brooks Co.
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
dct:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
ArgueDateB
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
loc
ArgueDate
  • --12-05
ArgueYear
case
  • Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.,
courtlistener
DecideDate
  • --01-05
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
  • Burnet, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, v. Sanford & Brooks Co.
Holding
  • An annual accounting system is a practical necessity if the federal income tax is to produce revenue ascertainable and payable at regular intervals.
justia
Litigants
  • Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.
majority
  • Stone
JoinMajority
  • unanimous
LawsApplied
ParallelCitations
Prior
  • 17280.0
USPage
USVol
has abstract
  • Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co., 282 U.S. 359 (1931), was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court dealing with accounting for purposes of federal income tax and the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The case held that an annual accounting system is a practical necessity if the federal income tax is to produce revenue ascertainable and payable at regular intervals. The case was decided at a time when losses could not be carried forward to future years. Since 2018, Section 172 of the Internal Revenue Code now generally allows a taxpayer to use net operating losses from previous years to deduct up to 80% of income for a given year.
googlescholar
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
is foaf:primaryTopic of
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is Wikipage redirect of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git81 as of Jul 16 2021


Alternative Linked Data Documents: PivotViewer | ODE     Content Formats:       RDF       ODATA       Microdata      About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3322 as of Sep 15 2021, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc25), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2021 OpenLink Software