About: Buck v. Bell     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., in which the Court ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, "for the protection and health of the state" did not violate the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Despite the changing attitudes in the coming decades regarding sterilization, the Supreme Court has never expressly overturned Buck v. Bell. It was widely believed to have been slightly weakened by Skinner v. Oklahoma 316 U.S. 535 (1942), which involved compulsory sterilization of male habitual criminals (and came to a contrary result). The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 has

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Buck v. Bell
  • Бак против Белла
  • 巴克訴貝爾案
rdfs:comment
  • Бак против Белла, 274 U.S. 200 (1927) — дело Верховного суда США, решение по которому подтвердило законность статута о принудительной стерилизации «неполноценных» людей, включая умственно отсталых с целью «защиты и здоровья нации». Это решение рассматривалось как пример негативной евгеники — улучшения человечества путём предотвращения размножения дефектных особей.
  • 巴克訴貝爾案(Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927))是美國一個關於優生學和強制絕育有關的案件。判決結果由法官小奧利弗·溫德爾·霍姆斯於美國聯邦最高法院在1927年做出。判決結果認為,為了保護國家及人民的健康,為智力受損者進行強制絕育手術並沒有違反美利堅合眾國憲法第十四條修正案。該判決結果被認為是擁護消極優生學的代表。最高法院至今仍未推翻該判決結果。
  • Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., in which the Court ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, "for the protection and health of the state" did not violate the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Despite the changing attitudes in the coming decades regarding sterilization, the Supreme Court has never expressly overturned Buck v. Bell. It was widely believed to have been slightly weakened by Skinner v. Oklahoma 316 U.S. 535 (1942), which involved compulsory sterilization of male habitual criminals (and came to a contrary result). The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 has
foaf:name
  • Carrie Buckv. John Hendren Bell, Superintendent of State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble Minded
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
dct:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git81 as of Jul 16 2021


Alternative Linked Data Documents: PivotViewer | ODE     Content Formats:       RDF       ODATA       Microdata      About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3322 as of Sep 15 2021, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc25), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2021 OpenLink Software