About: Bourke v. Nissan Motor Co.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Bourke v. Nissan Motor Co. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FBourke_v._Nissan_Motor_Co.

Bourke v. Nissan Motor Corp., No. B068705 (Cal. Ct. App., July 26, 1993), was a California court case in which the Second Appellate District Court of the California Courts of Appeal upheld the original decision of the trial court in favor of the defendant, Nissan Motor Corporation, against the charges of the plaintiffs, who alleged wrongful termination, invasion of privacy, and violation of their constitutional right to privacy, under the California constitution, in connection with Nissan's retrieval, printing, and reading of E-mail messages authored by plaintiffs.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label	Bourke v. Nissan Motor Co. (en)
rdfs:comment	Bourke v. Nissan Motor Corp., No. B068705 (Cal. Ct. App., July 26, 1993), was a California court case in which the Second Appellate District Court of the California Courts of Appeal upheld the original decision of the trial court in favor of the defendant, Nissan Motor Corporation, against the charges of the plaintiffs, who alleged wrongful termination, invasion of privacy, and violation of their constitutional right to privacy, under the California constitution, in connection with Nissan's retrieval, printing, and reading of E-mail messages authored by plaintiffs. (en)
name	Bourke v. Nissan Motor Co. (en)
dcterms:subject	Internet privacy case law United States privacy case law Nissan
Wikipage page ID	22018503 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	901684406 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	California Courts of Appeal Non-publication Internet privacy Smyth v. Pillsbury Co. Common good Internet privacy case law Telephone tapping Tort Law report United States privacy case law E-mail Federal Communications Commission Nissan FTC Fair Information Practices Online Privacy Protection Act Workplace Fairness Privacy law Nissan Motors E-mail privacy California Court of Appeal
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.ca-employment-lawyers.com/Wrongful-Termination.htm http://www.garage.com/resources/reference/internet_email_privacy.shtml http://www.privacy.gov.au/internet/email/ https://www.google.com/EMail https://web.archive.org/web/20090109002556/http:/www.iabc.com/cwb/archive/2004/0304/legal.htm https://web.archive.org/web/20090209070149/http:/lawcrawler.findlaw.com/MAD/faqemail.htm https://web.archive.org/web/20090308011113/http:/www.privacycom.org/ https://web.archive.org/web/20090425145102/http:/www.mttlr.org/volfive/schnaitman_art.html%23fnref93 https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv=ciHfCakYAj0
sameAs	Bourke v. Nissan Motor Co. Bourke v. Nissan Motor Co. Bourke v. Nissan Motor Co.
subsequent actions	none (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Blacklisted-links dbt:Orphan dbt:Reflist dbt:Privacy dbt:Infobox_court_case
court	California Court of Appeal
full name	Bonita P. Bourke et al., v. Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A. (en)
judges	Douglas A. McKee (en)
has abstract	Bourke v. Nissan Motor Corp., No. B068705 (Cal. Ct. App., July 26, 1993), was a California court case in which the Second Appellate District Court of the California Courts of Appeal upheld the original decision of the trial court in favor of the defendant, Nissan Motor Corporation, against the charges of the plaintiffs, who alleged wrongful termination, invasion of privacy, and violation of their constitutional right to privacy, under the California constitution, in connection with Nissan's retrieval, printing, and reading of E-mail messages authored by plaintiffs. The court ruled that the employer had a right to monitor an employee's E-mail and to terminate employees for sending E-mail of a personal, sexual nature. California's Wiretap and privacy laws did not protect employees from employer monitoring. The Court of Appeal designated this opinion "Not to be published" and it was not reported in the typical opinion reporters. (en)
date decided	1993-07-26 (xsd:date)
opinions	The court ruled that plaintiffs had no reasonable expectation of privacy, and therefore employer had right to monitor employee's E-mail and to terminate employees for using company E-mail system for personal use. (en)
prior actions	Bourke v. Nissan Motor Co., No. YC-003979 (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Bourke_v._Nissan_Motor_Co.?oldid=901684406&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	16299 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Bourke_v._Nissan_Motor_Co.
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Bourke_v._Nissan_Motor_Co.

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 51 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software