About: Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Company, 188 U.S. 239 (1903), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court found that advertisements were protected by copyright. The case is now cited for the proposition that commercial speech can be protected by copyright.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Communication100033020 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:Poster106793426 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case yago:Sign106793231 yago:WikicatPosters umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label	Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co. (en)
rdfs:comment	Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Company, 188 U.S. 239 (1903), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court found that advertisements were protected by copyright. The case is now cited for the proposition that commercial speech can be protected by copyright. (en)
foaf:name	(en) George Bleistein, et al.. v. Donaldson Lithographing Company (en)
foaf:depiction
dct:subject	United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Fuller Court United States copyright case law Posters 1903 in United States case law
Wikipage page ID	19137520 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1090247948 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Benjamin Wallace (circus owner) United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit United States Supreme Court United States Supreme Court cases Constitution of the United States Circus Copyright Copyright Act of 1870 Édouard Manet Federal Reporter United States Supreme Court cases of the Fuller Court United States copyright case law Etching Francisco Goya Rochelle C. Dreyfuss Hagenbeck-Wallace Circus Jane C. Ginsburg Article One of the United States Constitution Posters L. Ed. 1903 in United States case law Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Plaintiff Chromolithograph United States Revised Statutes U.S. LEXIS dbr:Copyright_Act_of_1874 dbr:Courier_Lithographing_Company dbr:Donaldson_Lithographing_Company
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/188/239/ http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep188/usrep188239/usrep188239.pdf https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=3277054592305773876 https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95780/bleistein-v-donaldson-lithographing-co/
sameAs	Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co. Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co. Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co. Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.
SubmitDate	0001-12-13 (xsd:gMonthDay)
SubmitYear	1883 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Blockquote dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:USArticleI
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/The_Great_Wallace_Shows_statues_circus_poster.jpg?width=300
Dissent	Harlan (en)
JoinDissent	McKenna (en)
JoinMajority	Fuller, Brown, White, Brewer, Shiras, Peckham (en)
LawsApplied	U.S. Const. art. I; U.S. Rev. Stat. §§ 4952, 4965 (en)
ParallelCitations	23 (xsd:integer)
Prior	Judgment for defendant, Courier Lithographing Co. v. Donaldson Lithographing Co., 104 F. 996 (en)
USPage	239 (xsd:integer)
USVol	188 (xsd:integer)
case	Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co., (en)
courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/95780/bleistein-v-donaldson-lithographing-co/
DecideDate	0001-02-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1903 (xsd:integer)
fullname	George Bleistein, et al.. v. Donaldson Lithographing Company (en)
Holding	Illustrations created primarily for the purpose of advertising are within the protection of copyright. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/188/239/
Litigants	Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Company (en)
majority	Holmes (en)
loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep188/usrep188239/usrep188239.pdf
has abstract	Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Company, 188 U.S. 239 (1903), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court found that advertisements were protected by copyright. The case is now cited for the proposition that commercial speech can be protected by copyright. (en)
googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=3277054592305773876
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Bleistein_v._Donaldson_Lithographing_Co.?oldid=1090247948&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	5667 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 69 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software