About: Bates v. City of Little Rock     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Bates v. City of Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516 (1960), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution forbade state government to compel the disclosure of an organization's membership lists via a tax-exemption regulatory scheme.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Bates v. City of Little Rock
rdfs:comment
  • Bates v. City of Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516 (1960), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution forbade state government to compel the disclosure of an organization's membership lists via a tax-exemption regulatory scheme.
foaf:name
  • Bates et al. v. City of Little Rock et al.
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
dct:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
Concurrence
  • Black and Douglas
Subsequent
  • 172800.0
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
loc
ArgueDate
  • --11-18
ArgueYear
case
  • Bates v. City of Little Rock,
courtlistener
date
DecideDate
  • --02-23
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
  • Bates et al. v. City of Little Rock et al.
Holding
  • State governments cannot compel the disclosure of an organization's membership lists when it inhibits freedom of association.
justia
Litigants
  • Bates v. City of Little Rock
majority
  • Stewart
title
  • First Amendment Library entry for Bates v. City of Little Rock
url
JoinMajority
  • unanimous court
LawsApplied
  • U.S. Const. amend. I and XIV
oyez
ParallelCitations
  • 172800.0
Prior
  • Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas
USPage
USVol
has abstract
  • Bates v. City of Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516 (1960), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution forbade state government to compel the disclosure of an organization's membership lists via a tax-exemption regulatory scheme. This is a companion case to NAACP v. Alabama (1958), which also held that NAACP membership records are protected by First Amendment freedom of association, and Talley v. California (1960), which held that Talley, a civil rights activist, could not be fined for an anonymous flyer. These cases help establish the right to privacy under the First Amendment, expanded on in Roe v. Wade (1973) and Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Committee (1982).
googlescholar
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
is foaf:primaryTopic of
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git81 as of Jul 16 2021


Alternative Linked Data Documents: PivotViewer | ODE     Content Formats:       RDF       ODATA       Microdata      About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3322 as of Sep 15 2021, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc25), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2021 OpenLink Software