About: Anti-copyright notice     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FAnti-copyright_notice

An anti-copyright notice is a specific statement that is added to a work in order to encourage wide distribution. Such notices are legally required to host such specific media; under the Berne Convention in international copyright law, works are protected even if no copyright statement is attached to them. However, "anti-copyright" statements typically do not take the form of either sophisticated public copyright licenses or a simple dedication to the public domain; instead, they usually just encourage wide distribution. Depending on jurisdiction, it is possible to denounce all claims to copyright in a work including moral rights in a written disclaimer.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Anti-copyright notice (en)
  • Pemberitahuan antihak cipta (in)
rdfs:comment
  • An anti-copyright notice is a specific statement that is added to a work in order to encourage wide distribution. Such notices are legally required to host such specific media; under the Berne Convention in international copyright law, works are protected even if no copyright statement is attached to them. However, "anti-copyright" statements typically do not take the form of either sophisticated public copyright licenses or a simple dedication to the public domain; instead, they usually just encourage wide distribution. Depending on jurisdiction, it is possible to denounce all claims to copyright in a work including moral rights in a written disclaimer. (en)
  • Pemberitahuan antihak cipta ditambahkan ke sebuah ciptaan untuk mempermudah distribusi secara luas. Pemberitahuan tersebut diwajibkan secara legal untuk meng-host media tersebut; di bawah Konvensi Bern, suatu ciptaan dapat dilindungi meskipun tidak ada pernyataan hak cipta. Namun, pernyataan "antihak cipta" umumnya tidak berbentuk lisensi hak cipta publik atau dedikasi domain publik; tetapi sebaliknya, justru ada dorongan untuk pendistribusian secara luas. Bergantung yurisdiksinya, cukup mungkin untuk menolak semua klaim hak cipta dalam sebuah karya termasuk hak moral dalam penyangkalan tertulis. (in)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
has abstract
  • An anti-copyright notice is a specific statement that is added to a work in order to encourage wide distribution. Such notices are legally required to host such specific media; under the Berne Convention in international copyright law, works are protected even if no copyright statement is attached to them. However, "anti-copyright" statements typically do not take the form of either sophisticated public copyright licenses or a simple dedication to the public domain; instead, they usually just encourage wide distribution. Depending on jurisdiction, it is possible to denounce all claims to copyright in a work including moral rights in a written disclaimer. An example of an anti-copyright notice is the following: "Anti-Copyright! Reprint freely, in any manner desired, even without naming the source." Where such notices are attached depends highly on the type of work. They are often found in anarcho-socialist magazines and books. A copyright waiver might state the following: The author of this work hereby waives all claim of copyright (economic and moral) in this work and immediately places it in the public domain; it may be used, distorted or destroyed in any manner whatsoever without further attribution or notice to the creator. The Creative Commons CC0 was created for compatibility with also law domains (e.g. civil law of continental Europe) which have problems with the concept of dedicating into public domain, as waiver statement with a fallback all-permissive license. The WTFPL, first published in 2000, differs from licenses with public domain designations in that an author can use it even if they do not necessarily have the ability to place their work in the public domain according to their local laws. The Unlicense, published around 2010, has a focus on an anti-copyright message. Woody Guthrie used an anti-copyright notice on his songs: This song is Copyrighted in U.S., under Seal of Copyright # 154085, for a period of 28 years, and anybody caught singin it without our permission, will be mighty good friends of ourn, cause we don’t give a dern. Publish it. Write it. Sing it. Swing to it. Yodel it. We wrote it, that’s all we wanted to do. Despite this, a number of organisations claim copyright of Guthrie's songs. Most people would regard "anti-copyright" notices as being equivalent to a dedication of material into the public domain (as in the second example above). Some of these disclaimers, however, are less accurate and need to be interpreted individually as the term anti-copyright has no accepted legal meaning. For example, if just free distribution is encouraged, modification or lack of attribution is still illegal, making the material ineligible for collaborative writing projects like English Wikipedia. In such a case anti-copyright is not a true denial of copyright, but just a modification of the protection it affords copyright holders. (en)
  • Pemberitahuan antihak cipta ditambahkan ke sebuah ciptaan untuk mempermudah distribusi secara luas. Pemberitahuan tersebut diwajibkan secara legal untuk meng-host media tersebut; di bawah Konvensi Bern, suatu ciptaan dapat dilindungi meskipun tidak ada pernyataan hak cipta. Namun, pernyataan "antihak cipta" umumnya tidak berbentuk lisensi hak cipta publik atau dedikasi domain publik; tetapi sebaliknya, justru ada dorongan untuk pendistribusian secara luas. Bergantung yurisdiksinya, cukup mungkin untuk menolak semua klaim hak cipta dalam sebuah karya termasuk hak moral dalam penyangkalan tertulis. Contohnya: "Antihak Cipta! Silakan cetak ulang, untuk tujuan apa pun, dengan cara apa pun, tanpa harus menyebut sumbernya dari mana." Apa pun penyertaannya, sangat bergantung pada jenis ciptaannya. Banyak ditemui di majalah dan buku anarko-sosialis. Pengabaian seluruh hak cipta dapat berbunyi sebagai berikut: Pencipta atas Ciptaan ini membebaskan seluruh klaim hak cipta, baik secara ekonomi maupun moral, dalam Ciptaan ini dan menempatkannya ke Domain Publik. Ciptaan ini boleh digunakan, didistorsikan, atau bahkan dimusnahkan dengan cara apa pun, tanpa batasan apa pun, tanpa memerlukan atribusi, izin, dan/atau sumber kepada Pencipta. Lisensi Dedikasi Domain Publik Creative Commons CC0 dibuat agar kompatibel dengan berbagai macam peraturan perundang-undangan, seperti civil law Eropa daratan yang memiliki persoalan terkait dedikasi domain publik, sebagai pernyataan pembebasan dengan suatu lisensi paling bebas. WTFPL, dibuat pertama kali pada 2000, berbeda dengan lisensi domain publik, mengingat pencipta boleh menggunakannya bahkan jika mereka tak harus mampu melepaskan ciptaannya di domain publik sesuai dengan undang-undang setempat. Unlicense, diterbitkan sekitar tahun 2010, memiliki fokus pada pesan anti-hak cipta. Woody Guthrie membuat pemberitahuan antihak cipta dalam lagu-lagunya: Lagu ini berhak cipta di Amerika Serikat, berdasarkan Seal of Copyright # 154085, selama 28 tahun, dan setiap orang yang kedapatan menyanyikannya tanpa izin kami, akan menjadi sahabat baik bagi kami, karena kami tak peduli. (Silakan) umumkan, nyanyikan, tuliskan, jogetkan, dendangkan. Kami menulisnya, karena hanya itulah yang kami inginkan. Namun hal ini justru memancing banyak organisasi mengeklaim hak cipta lagu karya Guthrie. Banyak orang menyebut pemberitahuan "antihak cipta" setara dengan dedikasi ciptaan ke domain publik (seperti pada contoh kedua). Ada sejumlah penyangkalan yang kurang akurat dan harus ditafsirkan secara individu karena pernyataan antihak cipta tak memiliki makna legal. Contohnya, meski ada distribusi gratis diberlakukan pada sebuah ciptaan, modifikasi atau kurangnya atribusi/sumber masih ilegal, sehingga ada materi yang tidak memenuhi syarat untuk proyek penulisan kolaboratif seperti Wikipedia. Dalam hal ini, antihak cipta bukanlah berarti menolak hak cipta, melainkan hanya modifikasi dari perlindungan yang diberikannya kepada pemegang hak cipta. (in)
gold:hypernym
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is Wikipage redirect of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 60 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software