About: Wright v. Warner Books, Inc.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Wright v. Warner Books, Inc. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FWright_v._Warner_Books%2C_Inc.&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org

Wright v. Warner Books (1991) was a case in which the widow of the author Richard Wright (1908–1960) claimed that his biographer, the poet and writer Margaret Walker (1915–1998), had infringed copyright by using content from some of Wright's unpublished letters and journals. The court took into account the recent ruling in Salinger v. Random House, Inc. (1987), which had found that a copyright owner had the right to control first publication, but found in favor of Walker after weighing all factors. The case had broad implications by allowing the use of library special collections for academic research.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label	Wright v. Warner Books, Inc. (en)
rdfs:comment	Wright v. Warner Books (1991) was a case in which the widow of the author Richard Wright (1908–1960) claimed that his biographer, the poet and writer Margaret Walker (1915–1998), had infringed copyright by using content from some of Wright's unpublished letters and journals. The court took into account the recent ruling in Salinger v. Random House, Inc. (1987), which had found that a copyright owner had the right to control first publication, but found in favor of Walker after weighing all factors. The case had broad implications by allowing the use of library special collections for academic research. (en)
name	Wright v. Warner Books (en)
dcterms:subject	Warner Bros. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit cases Works by Richard Wright (author) 1991 in United States case law United States copyright case law Biographies about African-American people Special collections libraries in the United States
Wikipage page ID	36263364 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1092687816 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Warner Bros. Richard Wright (author) United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit cases Works by Richard Wright (author) Salinger v. Random House, Inc. Thomas Joseph Meskill Copyright infringement 1991 in United States case law Special library United States copyright case law Fair use Breach of contract Paraphrasing of copyrighted material J. D. Salinger Biographies about African-American people Special collections libraries in the United States Kent State University Margaret Walker Yale University Summary judgment Warner Bros. Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. WTV Systems, Inc. Warner Books
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/953/731/222890/ https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=VNvgAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA118 https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=dpRKltgJYYwC&pg=PA50%7Caccess-date=2012-06-27%7Cdate=1994-01-26%7Cpublisher=Duke https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=4969177147306679183&hl=en&as_sdt=6&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
sameAs	Wright v. Warner Books, Inc. Wright v. Warner Books, Inc. Wright v. Warner Books, Inc. Wright v. Warner Books, Inc.
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Cite_book dbt:Cite_web dbt:Refbegin dbt:Refend dbt:Reflist dbt:Sfn dbt:Short_description dbt:Infobox_court_case
ArgueDate	1991-05-24 (xsd:date)
citations	17280.0 (second)
court	United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
full name	Ellen Wright, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Warner Books, Inc. and Margaret Walker, Also Known as Margaret Walker Alexander, Defendants-appellees (en)
judges	VAN GRAAFEILAND, MESKILL and McLAUGHLIN (en)
keywords	copyright infringement, unpublished works (en)
has abstract	Wright v. Warner Books (1991) was a case in which the widow of the author Richard Wright (1908–1960) claimed that his biographer, the poet and writer Margaret Walker (1915–1998), had infringed copyright by using content from some of Wright's unpublished letters and journals. The court took into account the recent ruling in Salinger v. Random House, Inc. (1987), which had found that a copyright owner had the right to control first publication, but found in favor of Walker after weighing all factors. The case had broad implications by allowing the use of library special collections for academic research. (en)
date decided	1991-11-21 (xsd:date)
opinions	Sparing use of creative expression from unpublished letters and journals may constitute fair use (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Wright_v._Warner_Books,_Inc.?oldid=1092687816&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	9011 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Wright_v._Warner_Books,_Inc.
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Richard Wright (author) Salinger v. Random House, Inc. Warner Bros. Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. WTV Systems, Inc. Wright v. Warner Books
is Wikipage redirect of	Wright v. Warner Books
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Wright_v._Warner_Books,_Inc.

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 39 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software