About: Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FVillage_of_Euclid_v._Ambler_Realty_Co.&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org

Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926), more commonly Euclid v. Ambler, was a United States Supreme Court landmark case argued in 1926. It was the first significant case regarding the relatively new practice of zoning. The Supreme Court's finding that local ordinance zoning was a valid exercise of the police power bolstered zoning in the United States and influenced other countries.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926), more commonly Euclid v. Ambler, was a United States Supreme Court landmark case argued in 1926. It was the first significant case regarding the relatively new practice of zoning. The Supreme Court's finding that local ordinance zoning was a valid exercise of the police power bolstered zoning in the United States and influenced other countries. (en)
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Village of Euclid, Ohio, et al. v. Ambler Realty Company (en)
geo:lat
geo:long
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
Dissent
  • Van Devanter, McReynolds, Butler (en)
JoinMajority
  • Taft, Holmes, Brandeis, Sanford, Stone (en)
LawsApplied
ParallelCitations
Prior
  • Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (en)
USPage
USVol
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
  • Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. , (en)
DecideDate
DecideYear
findlaw
fullname
  • Village of Euclid, Ohio, et al. v. Ambler Realty Company (en)
Holding
  • The Court held that the zoning ordinance was not an unreasonable extension of the village's police power and did not have the character of arbitrary fiat, and thus it was not unconstitutional. (en)
justia
Litigants
  • Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. (en)
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 37 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software