About: Soffiantini v Mould     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FSoffiantini_v_Mould&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org

Soffiantini v Mould is an important case in South African law. An appeal from a decision of , it was heard in the Eastern Districts Local Division by , and on 30 July 1956. Judgment was handed down on 14 August 1956. The appellant's attorneys were . The respondent's attorney was . The case concerned the relationship between landlord and tenant, and confirmed that, under the common law, a landlord is not entitled to enter leased premises without consent. The trespassing landlord can be interdicted.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Soffiantini v Mould (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Soffiantini v Mould is an important case in South African law. An appeal from a decision of , it was heard in the Eastern Districts Local Division by , and on 30 July 1956. Judgment was handed down on 14 August 1956. The appellant's attorneys were . The respondent's attorney was . The case concerned the relationship between landlord and tenant, and confirmed that, under the common law, a landlord is not entitled to enter leased premises without consent. The trespassing landlord can be interdicted. (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
has abstract
  • Soffiantini v Mould is an important case in South African law. An appeal from a decision of , it was heard in the Eastern Districts Local Division by , and on 30 July 1956. Judgment was handed down on 14 August 1956. The appellant's attorneys were . The respondent's attorney was . The case concerned the relationship between landlord and tenant, and confirmed that, under the common law, a landlord is not entitled to enter leased premises without consent. The trespassing landlord can be interdicted. The Court also found that, in respect of applications and motions, it is the duty of the Court to decide difficult issues of fact on affidavit where justice so requires. (en)
gold:hypernym
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 63 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software