About: Shouting fire in a crowded theater     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:Wikicat1919Works, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FShouting_fire_in_a_crowded_theater&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org

"Shouting fire in a crowded theater" is a popular analogy for speech or actions made for the principal purpose of creating panic. The phrase is a paraphrasing of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.'s opinion in the United States Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States in 1919, which held that the defendant's speech in opposition to the draft during World War I was not protected free speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The case was later partially overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969, which limited the scope of banned speech to that which would be directed to and likely to incite imminent lawless action (e.g. a riot).

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Berteriak "kebakaran!" di bioskop yang ramai (in)
  • Shouting fire in a crowded theater (en)
rdfs:comment
  • "Berteriak 'kebakaran!' di bioskop yang ramai" (bahasa Inggris: shouting fire in a crowded theater) adalah sebuah analogi populer untuk menggambarkan sebuah tindakan atau ekspresi yang dibuat untuk menciptakan kepanikan. Kata-kata yang digunakan dalam opini Holmes adalah "berteriak 'kebakaran' di sebuah bioskop dan menyebabkan kepanikan" (bahasa Inggris: falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic). Parafrase yang populer digunakan biasanya tidak memasukkan kata "dengan salah" (falsely), dan menambahkan kata "ramai" (crowded) untuk menggambarkan kondisi bioskop dalam analogi ini. (in)
  • "Shouting fire in a crowded theater" is a popular analogy for speech or actions made for the principal purpose of creating panic. The phrase is a paraphrasing of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.'s opinion in the United States Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States in 1919, which held that the defendant's speech in opposition to the draft during World War I was not protected free speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The case was later partially overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969, which limited the scope of banned speech to that which would be directed to and likely to incite imminent lawless action (e.g. a riot). (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 42 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software