• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Rowe v Electoral Commissioner     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatRightsInTheAustralianConstitutionCases, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Type: placeyago:Abstraction100002137yago:Abstraction105854150yago:Case107308889yago:Cognition100023271yago:Concept105835747yago:Content105809192yago:Event100029378yago:Happening107283608yago:Idea105833840yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntityyago:Right105174653yago:WikicatRightsInTheAustralianConstitutionCases New Facet based on Instances of this Class

Rowe v Electoral Commissioner is a High Court of Australia case dealing with the requirement of the Australian Constitution that members of Parliament be "directly chosen by the people". The High Court held that Commonwealth legislation that sought to restrict the time in which a person may seek to enroll in an election or alter their enrolment details after the writs for an election have been issued was invalid.