Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case related to trademark law under the Lanham Act. In the 9–0 decision on judgement, the Court ruled that a plaintiff in a trademark infringement lawsuit is not required to demonstrate that the defendant willfully infringed on their trademark to claim lost profit damages.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc. (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case related to trademark law under the Lanham Act. In the 9–0 decision on judgement, the Court ruled that a plaintiff in a trademark infringement lawsuit is not required to demonstrate that the defendant willfully infringed on their trademark to claim lost profit damages. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Romag Fasteners, Inc., Petitioner v. Fossil Group, Inc., fka Fossil, Inc., et al. (en)
|
dct:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
docket
| |
JoinMajority
| |
LawsApplied
| |
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., (en)
|
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - Romag Fasteners, Inc., Petitioner v. Fossil Group, Inc., fka Fossil, Inc., et al. (en)
|
Holding
| - A plaintiff in a trademark infringement suit is not required to show that a defendant willfully infringed the plaintiff’s trademark as a precondition to a profits award. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc. (en)
|
majority
| |
other source
| |
other url
| |
has abstract
| - Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case related to trademark law under the Lanham Act. In the 9–0 decision on judgement, the Court ruled that a plaintiff in a trademark infringement lawsuit is not required to demonstrate that the defendant willfully infringed on their trademark to claim lost profit damages. (en)
|
Concurrence
| - Sotomayor (en)
- Alito (en)
|
JoinConcurrence
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |