• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Robert T. Pennock     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:Wikicat20th-centuryPhilosophers, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Type: Thingfoaf:Personpersondul:NaturalPersonEukaryoteHomo sapiensHumanAnimalanimaleukaryotescientistspeciesschema:Personyago:WikicatLivingPeopleScientistyago:CausalAgent100007347yago:Intellectual109621545yago:LivingThing100004258yago:Object100002684yago:Organism100004475yago:Person100007846yago:Philosopher110423589yago:PhysicalEntity100001930yago:YagoLegalActoryago:YagoLegalActorGeoyago:Scholar110557854yago:Scientist110560637yago:Whole100003553yago:Wikicat20th-centuryPhilosophers New Facet based on Instances of this Class

Robert T. Pennock is a philosopher working on the Avida digital organism project at Michigan State University where he has been full professor since 2000. Pennock was a witness in the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial, testifying on behalf of the plaintiffs, and described how intelligent design is an updated form of creationism and not science, pointing out that the arguments were essentially the same as traditional creationist arguments with adjustments to the message to eliminate explicit mention of God and the Bible as well as adopting a postmodern deconstructionist language. Pennock also laid out the philosophical history of methodological and philosophical naturalism as they underpin to science, and explained that if intelligent design were truly embraced it would return