• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Reasonable person     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatElementsOfCrime, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Type: personyago:WikicatLegalDoctrinesAndPrinciplesyago:WikicatLegalFictionsyago:Abstraction100002137yago:Belief105941423yago:Cognition100023271yago:Communication100033020yago:Component105868954yago:Concept105835747yago:Content105809192yago:Doctrine105943300yago:Fiction106367107yago:Idea105833840yago:LiteraryComposition106364329yago:Part105867413yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100yago:Writing106362953yago:WrittenCommunication106349220yago:WikicatElementsOfCrime New Facet based on Instances of this Class

In law, a reasonable person, reasonable man, or the man on the Clapham omnibus, is a hypothetical person of legal fiction crafted by the courts and communicated through case law and jury instructions. Strictly according to the fiction, it is misconceived for a party to seek evidence from actual people to establish how the reasonable man would have acted or what he would have foreseen. This person's character and care conduct under any common set of facts, is decided through reasoning of good practice or policy—or "learned" permitting there is a compelling consensus of public opinion—by high courts.