Perez v. Sharp, also known as Perez v. Lippold or Perez v. Moroney, is a 1948 case decided by the Supreme Court of California in which the court held by a 4–3 majority that the state's ban on interracial marriage violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:label
| - Caso Pérez contra Sharp (es)
- Perez v. Sharp (en)
|
| rdfs:comment
| - El Caso Pérez contra Sharp, también conocido como Pérez contra Lippold o Pérez contra Moroney, es un caso de 1948 decidido por la Corte Suprema de California en el que la corte sostuvo por una mayoría de 4 a 3 que la prohibición estatal del matrimonio interracial violaba la Decimocuarta Enmienda a la Constitución de los Estados Unidos. (es)
- Perez v. Sharp, also known as Perez v. Lippold or Perez v. Moroney, is a 1948 case decided by the Supreme Court of California in which the court held by a 4–3 majority that the state's ban on interracial marriage violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. (en)
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Wikipage page ID
| |
| Wikipage revision ID
| |
| Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
| Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
| sameAs
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| LawsApplied
| - U.S. Const. Amend. XIV cl. 1, and Cal. Civ. Code, §§ 60, 69, 69a (en)
|
| Prior
| |
| citations
| |
| DecideDate
| |
| DecideYear
| |
| fullname
| - Andrea D. Perez and Sylvester S. Davis, Jr. v. A.W. Sharp, as County Clerk of the County of Los Angeles (en)
|
| Holding
| - Marriage is a fundamental right in a free society; the state may not restrict this right with respect to restrictions based upon the race of the parties. (en)
|
| Litigants
| |
| has abstract
| - El Caso Pérez contra Sharp, también conocido como Pérez contra Lippold o Pérez contra Moroney, es un caso de 1948 decidido por la Corte Suprema de California en el que la corte sostuvo por una mayoría de 4 a 3 que la prohibición estatal del matrimonio interracial violaba la Decimocuarta Enmienda a la Constitución de los Estados Unidos. La decisión de pluralidad de tres jueces fue redactada por el juez asociado Roger J. Traynor, quien más tarde se desempeñaría como presidente del Tribunal Supremo. El juez Douglas L. Edmonds escribió su propia concurrencia de la sentencia, lo que llevó a una mayoría de cuatro jueces a favor de derogar la ley. La disidencia fue escrita por el juez asociado John W. Shenk, el segundo miembro con más años de servicio en la historia de la Corte y un conservador judicial notable. La opinión fue la primera de cualquier estado en anular permanentemente una ley contra el mestizaje en los Estados Unidos. (es)
- Perez v. Sharp, also known as Perez v. Lippold or Perez v. Moroney, is a 1948 case decided by the Supreme Court of California in which the court held by a 4–3 majority that the state's ban on interracial marriage violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The three justice plurality decision was authored by Associate Justice Roger J. Traynor who would later serve as the Court's Chief Justice. Justice Douglas L. Edmonds wrote his own concurrence of the judgment, leading to a four-justice majority in favor of striking down the law. The dissent was written by Associate Justice John W. Shenk, the second longest-serving member in the Court's history and a notable judicial conservative. The opinion was the first of any state to permanently strike down an anti-miscegenation law in the United States. (en)
|
| AssociateJudges
| |
| ChiefJudge
| |
| Concurrence
| |
| Concurrence/Dissent
| |
| JoinConcurrence/Dissent
| |
| JoinPlurality
| |
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)