About: People v. Drew

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: People v. Drew Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FPeople_v._Drew&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org

People v. Drew, 22 Cal. 3d 333 (1978), was a case decided by the California Supreme Court that abandoned the M'Naghten Rules of the criminal insanity defense in favor of the formulation in the Model Penal Code. The decision was later abrogated by Proposition 8 in 1982, which restored the M'Naghten rules.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	People v. Drew (en)
rdfs:comment	People v. Drew, 22 Cal. 3d 333 (1978), was a case decided by the California Supreme Court that abandoned the M'Naghten Rules of the criminal insanity defense in favor of the formulation in the Model Penal Code. The decision was later abrogated by Proposition 8 in 1982, which restored the M'Naghten rules. (en)
dcterms:subject	1978 in California U.S. state criminal case law 1978 in United States case law California state case law
Wikipage page ID	26866215 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1080046812 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	California Supreme Court Rose Bird California Proposition 8 (1982) Insanity defense Mathew Tobriner Frank C. Newman Frank K. Richardson 1978 in California Stanley Mosk U.S. state criminal case law 1978 in United States case law Wiley Manuel William P. Clark Jr. California state case law Model Penal Code M'Naghten Rules Legal insanity
sameAs	People v. Drew People v. Drew People v. Drew
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Law_report dbt:Infobox_California_Supreme_Court_case
Dissent	Richardson (en)
JoinDissent	Clark, Manuel (en)
JoinMajority	Bird, Newman (en)
citations	17280.0 (second)
DecideDate	0001-09-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1978 (xsd:integer)
fullname	The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ronald Jay Drew, Defendant and Appellant. (en)
Holding	The M'Naghten Rules do not adequately identify legal insanity. M'Naghten Rules discarded. Model Penal Code adopted. (en)
majority	Tobriner (en)
has abstract	People v. Drew, 22 Cal. 3d 333 (1978), was a case decided by the California Supreme Court that abandoned the M'Naghten Rules of the criminal insanity defense in favor of the formulation in the Model Penal Code. The decision was later abrogated by Proposition 8 in 1982, which restored the M'Naghten rules. (en)
AssociateJudges	Mathew Tobriner Frank C. Newman Frank K. Richardson Stanley Mosk Wiley Manuel William P. Clark Jr.
ChiefJudge	Rose Bird
Concurrence	Mosk (en)
Overruled	California Proposition 8 (1982)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:People_v._Drew?oldid=1080046812&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	1670 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:People_v._Drew
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Insanity defense M'Naghten rules 583 P.2d 1318 149 Cal.Rptr. 275 22 Cal.3d 333 22 Cal. 3d 333
is Wikipage redirect of	583 P.2d 1318 149 Cal.Rptr. 275 22 Cal.3d 333 22 Cal. 3d 333
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:People_v._Drew

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 60 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software