About: Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FMills_Music%2C_Inc._v._Snyder&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org

Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder, 469 U.S. 153 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that if the author of a work authorizes derivatives, the terms negotiated in exchange for that grant stand even if the grant is later rescinded. If the copyright holder deputizes another person to authorize derivative works, the law draws no distinction between such works and those directly authorized by the copyright holder.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder (en)
rdfs:comment	Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder, 469 U.S. 153 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that if the author of a work authorizes derivatives, the terms negotiated in exchange for that grant stand even if the grant is later rescinded. If the copyright holder deputizes another person to authorize derivative works, the law draws no distinction between such works and those directly authorized by the copyright holder. (en)
foaf:name	(en) Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder (en)
dcterms:subject	United States Supreme Court cases 1985 in United States case law United States copyright case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court
Wikipage page ID	57816721 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1018426576 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit LexisNexis United States Supreme Court cases 1985 in United States case law Who's Sorry Now? (song) Lawyers' Edition United States copyright case law Harry Fox Agency Ted Snyder United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court Supreme Court of the United States Mechanical license
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep469/usrep469153/usrep469153.pdf https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/469/153.html https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=1446033467705496904 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/469/153/case.html https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/469/153 https://www.oyez.org/cases/1984/83-1153
sameAs	Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:SCOTUS-case-stub dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Explain dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:USArticleI
Dissent	White (en)
JoinDissent	Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun (en)
JoinMajority	Burger, Powell, Rehnquist, O'Connor (en)
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1984/83-1153
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
USPage	153 (xsd:integer)
USVol	469 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-10-09 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	1984 (xsd:integer)
case	Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder, (en)
DecideDate	0001-01-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1985 (xsd:integer)
findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/469/153.html
fullname	Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder (en)
Holding	If the author of a work authorizes derivatives, the terms negotiated in exchange for that grant stand even if the grant is later rescinded. If the copyright holder deputizes another person to authorize derivative works, the law draws no distinction between such works and those directly authorized by the copyright holder. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/469/153/case.html
Litigants	Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder (en)
majority	Stevens (en)
loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep469/usrep469153/usrep469153.pdf
has abstract	Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder, 469 U.S. 153 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that if the author of a work authorizes derivatives, the terms negotiated in exchange for that grant stand even if the grant is later rescinded. If the copyright holder deputizes another person to authorize derivative works, the law draws no distinction between such works and those directly authorized by the copyright holder. The case was a dispute regarding publishing royalties for the popular song "Who's Sorry Now?", which Mills Music had licensed (through mechanical licenses) to recording companies, who created records of the song, or derivative works; after the death of Ted Snyder, the song's composer, his heirs terminated the agreement with Mills Music. They believed that Mills was no longer entitled to its share in the royalties. Mills, through the Harry Fox Agency, sued in federal court in New York, where it won, but was overturned in the Second Circuit, before finally appealing to the Supreme Court, which granted certiorari in March 1984. (en)
cornell	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/469/153
googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=1446033467705496904
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Mills_Music,_Inc._v._Snyder?oldid=1018426576&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	3420 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Mills_Music,_Inc._v._Snyder
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	List of United States Supreme Court copyright case law Who's Sorry Now? (song) 469 U.S. 153 Ted Snyder Mills Music, Inc. v Snyder
is Wikipage redirect of	469 U.S. 153 Mills Music, Inc. v Snyder
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Mills_Music,_Inc._v._Snyder

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software