About: Maples v. Thomas     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FMaples_v._Thomas&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org

Maples v. Thomas, 565 U.S. 266 (2012), is a United States Supreme Court ruling in which the Court ruled 7–2 that Cory R. Maples, who had been convicted of murdering two people and faced a possible death sentence, should get another opportunity in court because his lawyers at Sullivan & Cromwell had abandoned him. Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented from the Court's holding, arguing that the procedural default shouldn't be excused.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Maples v. Thomas (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Maples v. Thomas, 565 U.S. 266 (2012), is a United States Supreme Court ruling in which the Court ruled 7–2 that Cory R. Maples, who had been convicted of murdering two people and faced a possible death sentence, should get another opportunity in court because his lawyers at Sullivan & Cromwell had abandoned him. Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented from the Court's holding, arguing that the procedural default shouldn't be excused. (en)
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Cory S. Maples v. Kim T. Thomas, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
Subsequent
  • On remand, Maples v. Comm'r of Ala. Dep't of Corr., 460 F. App'x 860 . (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
Dissent
  • Scalia (en)
docket
JoinDissent
  • Thomas (en)
JoinMajority
  • Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
USPage
USVol
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
  • Maples v. Thomas, (en)
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
  • Cory S. Maples v. Kim T. Thomas, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections (en)
Holding
  • Maples has shown the requisite “cause” to excuse his procedural default due to the abandonment of his attorneys during a critical stage of his appeals. (en)
justia
Litigants
  • Maples v. Thomas (en)
majority
  • Ginsburg (en)
other source
  • Supreme Court (en)
other url
has abstract
  • Maples v. Thomas, 565 U.S. 266 (2012), is a United States Supreme Court ruling in which the Court ruled 7–2 that Cory R. Maples, who had been convicted of murdering two people and faced a possible death sentence, should get another opportunity in court because his lawyers at Sullivan & Cromwell had abandoned him. Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented from the Court's holding, arguing that the procedural default shouldn't be excused. (en)
Concurrence
  • Alito (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is Wikipage redirect of
is Wikipage disambiguates of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 51 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software