About: Lis alibi pendens

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Lis alibi pendens Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FLis_alibi_pendens&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org

The principle of lis alibi pendens (Latin for 'dispute elsewhere pending') applies both in municipal law, public international law, and private international law to address the problem of potentially contradictory judgments. If two courts were to hear the same dispute, it is possible they would reach inconsistent decisions. To avoid the problem, there are two rules.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Lis alibi pendens (en)
rdfs:comment	The principle of lis alibi pendens (Latin for 'dispute elsewhere pending') applies both in municipal law, public international law, and private international law to address the problem of potentially contradictory judgments. If two courts were to hear the same dispute, it is possible they would reach inconsistent decisions. To avoid the problem, there are two rules. (en)
dcterms:subject	Conflict of laws Legal rules with Latin names International law
Wikipage page ID	4397261 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1097634877 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Municipal law Convention on the Law of the Sea Injunction Inter partes Company (law) Conflict of laws Subrogation Cross-border injunction Appeal Comity Party (law) Private international law Public international law Legal rules with Latin names Habitual residence Jurisdiction Jurisdiction (area) Law of the United States International law European Court of Human Rights European Court of Justice Forum shopping Cause of action Judgment (law) Res judicata International Court of Justice International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Court Law of the European Union Domicile (law) Brussels Regime World Trade Organization European Convention on Human Rights Plaintiff Exclusive jurisdiction In rem Pleadings dbr:Turner_v_Grovit
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/brussels.jurisdiction.and.enforcement.of.judgments.in.civil.and.commercial.matters.convention.1968/doc.html http://www.law.ex.ac.uk/cels/documents/papepr_llm_03_04_dissertation_Eisengraeber_001.pdf http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/sem_april02_e/marceau.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20060126085433/http:/www.juridicum.su.se/jurweb/utbildning/master/ec_commercial_law/assignments/Hermione%20Heffernan.pdf
sameAs	Lis alibi pendens Lis alibi pendens Lis alibi pendens Lis alibi pendens Lis alibi pendens
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:ISBN dbt:Italic_title dbt:Portal dbt:Reflist dbt:Conflict_of_laws
has abstract	The principle of lis alibi pendens (Latin for 'dispute elsewhere pending') applies both in municipal law, public international law, and private international law to address the problem of potentially contradictory judgments. If two courts were to hear the same dispute, it is possible they would reach inconsistent decisions. To avoid the problem, there are two rules. Res judicata provides that once a case has been determined, it produces a judgment either inter partes or in rem depending on the subject matter of the dispute, i.e. although there can be an appeal on the merits, neither party can recommence proceedings on the same set of facts in another court. If this rule were not in place, litigation might never come to an endThe second rule is that proceedings on the same facts cannot be commenced in a second court if the lis (action), is already pendens (pending), in another court. Lis alibi pendens arises from international comity and it permits a court to refuse to exercise jurisdiction when there is parallel litigation pending in another jurisdiction. Shany (2003) considers the problem within the public international law field where, for example, the Southern Bluefin Tuna dispute could have been determined either by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), or by tribunals established under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), and the Swordfish dispute, which was submitted simultaneously to both the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) and a dispute settlement panel of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Kwak and Marceau (2002) consider the jurisdiction between the dispute settlement mechanisms of regional trade agreements (RTAs) and that of the WTO. (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Lis_alibi_pendens?oldid=1097634877&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	14434 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Lis_alibi_pendens
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Anchor defendant Concurrent jurisdiction Cross-border injunction Forum non conveniens List of Latin legal terms
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Lis_alibi_pendens

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 54 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software