About: In re A.C.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: In re A.C. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SoccerClubSeason, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FIn_re_A.C.&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org

In re A.C., 573 A.2d 1235 (1990), was a 1987 District of Columbia Court of Appeals case. It was the first appellate court case decided against forced Caesarean sections, although the decision was issued after the fatal procedure was performed. Physicians performed a Caesarean section upon patient Angela Carder (née Stoner) without informed consent in an unsuccessful attempt to save the life of her baby. The case stands as a landmark in United States case law establishing the rights of informed consent and bodily integrity for pregnant women.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:WikicatLegalIssuesInPregnancy yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Cognition100023271 yago:Content105809192 yago:Issue105814650 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 soccer club season
rdfs:label	In re A.C. (en)
rdfs:comment	In re A.C., 573 A.2d 1235 (1990), was a 1987 District of Columbia Court of Appeals case. It was the first appellate court case decided against forced Caesarean sections, although the decision was issued after the fatal procedure was performed. Physicians performed a Caesarean section upon patient Angela Carder (née Stoner) without informed consent in an unsuccessful attempt to save the life of her baby. The case stands as a landmark in United States case law establishing the rights of informed consent and bodily integrity for pregnant women. (en)
name	In re A.C. (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	1990 in United States case law Legal issues in pregnancy United States reproductive rights case law
Wikipage page ID	9948989 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1096976993 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Caesarean section Americans United for Life 1990 in United States case law Judith W. Rogers Julia Cooper Mack Informed consent Pregnant patients' rights in the United States George Annas Frank E. Schwelb George Washington University Hospital Theodore R. Newman Jr. Bodily integrity Pemberton v. Tallahassee Memorial Regional Center Stay of proceedings Legal issues in pregnancy United States reproductive rights case law Washington, D.C. American Civil Liberties Union American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Ama, Louisiana Amicus brief Ewing's sarcoma Atlantic Reporter James A. Belson Chemotherapy John A. Terry John M. Ferren John M. Steadman District of Columbia Court of Appeals Case law Radiation therapy Use of restraints on pregnant women United States Conference of Catholic Bishops Gellman, Barton dbr:In_re_Baby_Boy_Doe dbr:In_re_Fetus_Brown dbr:Stallman_v._Youngquist
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://advocatesforpregnantwomen.org/main/publications/articles_and_reports/the_rights_of_pregnant_patients_carder_case_brings_bold_policy_initiatives.php https://law.justia.com/cases/district-of-columbia/court-of-appeals/1990/87-609-4.html http://vimeo.com/4895023 https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1938095/in-re-ac/ https://www.leagle.com/decision/19901808573a2d123511799
sameAs	In re A.C. In re A.C. In re A.C. In re A.C.
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Cite_book dbt:Reflist dbt:Start_date dbt:Law_report dbt:Infobox_court_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/George_Washington_University_Hospital_-_2012.jpg?width=300
case	In re A.C. (en)
court	District of Columbia Court of Appeals
courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1938095/in-re-ac/
full name	In re A.C., Appellant. (en)
judges	Judith W. Rogers Julia Cooper Mack Frank E. Schwelb Theodore R. Newman Jr. James A. Belson John A. Terry John M. Ferren John M. Steadman
justia	https://law.justia.com/cases/district-of-columbia/court-of-appeals/1990/87-609-4.html
keywords	Informed consent Pregnant patients' rights in the United States Bodily integrity (en)
has abstract	In re A.C., 573 A.2d 1235 (1990), was a 1987 District of Columbia Court of Appeals case. It was the first appellate court case decided against forced Caesarean sections, although the decision was issued after the fatal procedure was performed. Physicians performed a Caesarean section upon patient Angela Carder (née Stoner) without informed consent in an unsuccessful attempt to save the life of her baby. The case stands as a landmark in United States case law establishing the rights of informed consent and bodily integrity for pregnant women. (en)
Concur/dissent	Belson (en)
concurring	Rogers, Newman, Ferren, Steadman, Schwelb (en)
date decided	1990-04-26 (xsd:date)
decision by	Terry (en)
leagle	https://www.leagle.com/decision/19901808573a2d123511799
number of judges	8 (xsd:integer)
gold:hypernym	C
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:In_re_A.C.?oldid=1096976993&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	10940 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:In_re_A.C.
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Angela Carder Pemberton v. Tallahassee Memorial Regional Center

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 42 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software