About: Hall v. Sebelius

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Hall v. Sebelius Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

Hall v. Sebelius, 667 F.3d 1293 (D.C. Cir. 2012), was a D.C. Circuit case decided in February 2012 involving the question of whether or not the Secretary of Health, then Kathleen Sebelius, is required to provide a means for those with Social Security benefits to terminate Medicare benefits.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label	Hall v. Sebelius (en)
rdfs:comment	Hall v. Sebelius, 667 F.3d 1293 (D.C. Cir. 2012), was a D.C. Circuit case decided in February 2012 involving the question of whether or not the Secretary of Health, then Kathleen Sebelius, is required to provide a means for those with Social Security benefits to terminate Medicare benefits. (en)
foaf:depiction
dct:subject	2012 in United States case law United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit cases
Wikipage page ID	41717918 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1105496456 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Brett Kavanaugh United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 2012 in United States case law D.C. Cir. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit cases Karen L. Henderson Kathleen Sebelius Douglas H. Ginsburg Writ of certiorari United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit F.3d
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20120207171 https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=18082840819250199844 https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/890596479218E0818525799D00548389/$file/11-5076-1356903.pdf
sameAs	Hall v. Sebelius Hall v. Sebelius Hall v. Sebelius Hall v. Sebelius
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Orphan dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Infobox_U.S._Courts_of_Appeals_case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_District_of_Columbia.png?width=300
Dissent	Henderson (en)
JoinMajority	Ginsburg (en)
ArgueDate	0001-10-13 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	2011 (xsd:integer)
case	25920.0 (second)
citations	25920.0 (second)
court	United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
CourtSeal	Seal of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.png (en)
DecideDate	0001-02-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	2012 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Brian Hall, et al., Appellants v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary Of The United States Department Of Health And Human Services, and Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Appellees (en)
Holding	Because people are not required to use their Medicare benefits, they cannot be allowed to cancel Medicare coverage without also cancelling Social Security benefits. (en)
judges	Brett Kavanaugh Karen L. Henderson Douglas H. Ginsburg
Litigants	Hall v. Sebelius (en)
majority	Kavanaugh (en)
other source	D.C. Circuit (en)
other url	https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/890596479218E0818525799D00548389/$file/11-5076-1356903.pdf
has abstract	Hall v. Sebelius, 667 F.3d 1293 (D.C. Cir. 2012), was a D.C. Circuit case decided in February 2012 involving the question of whether or not the Secretary of Health, then Kathleen Sebelius, is required to provide a means for those with Social Security benefits to terminate Medicare benefits. Brian Hall, along with the other petitioners, had made full payments into Social Security accounts. They were therefore automatically entitled into Medicare. However, they did not invoke its use and preferred their own private health insurance. However, statutes allowed this only if they also gave up Social Security, and they did not wish to also cancel their Social Security benefits. The court ruled that since they were not required to use their Medicare benefits, they could not be allowed to cancel Medicare coverage without also cancelling Social Security benefits. (en)
googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=18082840819250199844
leagle	https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20120207171
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Hall_v._Sebelius?oldid=1105496456&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	7729 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Hall_v._Sebelius
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Hall_v._Sebelius

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 49 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software