About: Grant v Torstar Corp     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:Place, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FGrant_v_Torstar_Corp&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org

Grant v Torstar Corp, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 640, 2009 SCC 61, is a 2009 Supreme Court of Canada decision on the defences to the tort of defamation. The Supreme Court ruled that the law of defamation should give way to the rights of a party to speak on matters of public interest, provided the party exercises a certain level of responsibility in verifying the potentially defamatory facts. This decision recognizes a defence of responsible communication on matters of public interest.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Grant v Torstar Corp (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Grant v Torstar Corp, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 640, 2009 SCC 61, is a 2009 Supreme Court of Canada decision on the defences to the tort of defamation. The Supreme Court ruled that the law of defamation should give way to the rights of a party to speak on matters of public interest, provided the party exercises a certain level of responsibility in verifying the potentially defamatory facts. This decision recognizes a defence of responsible communication on matters of public interest. (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
JoinMajority
  • Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell. (en)
citations
date
  • July 2021 (en)
history
  • APPEAL and CROSS‑APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal , Grant v. Torstar Corporation, 2008 ONCA 796, 92 OR 561, 301 DLR 129, 243 OAC 120, 61 CCLT 195, 71 CPR 352, [2008] OJ No 4783 , 2008 CarswellOnt 7155, setting aside a decision of Rivard J. and a jury award and ordering a new trial. (en)
majority
reason
  • More details from a reliable legal source are desirable. (en)
  • Property described in Globe and Mail article is on Lake Timiskaming and has no golf course, whereas the property in the lawsuit is on Twin Lakes. Article mentions that a golf course is for sale; a more specific citation is desirable. (en)
has abstract
  • Grant v Torstar Corp, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 640, 2009 SCC 61, is a 2009 Supreme Court of Canada decision on the defences to the tort of defamation. The Supreme Court ruled that the law of defamation should give way to the rights of a party to speak on matters of public interest, provided the party exercises a certain level of responsibility in verifying the potentially defamatory facts. This decision recognizes a defence of responsible communication on matters of public interest. (en)
case-name
  • Grant v Torstar Corp (en)
Concurrence/Dissent
decided-date
full-case-name
  • Peter Grant v Torstar Corporation (en)
heard-date
ruling
  • Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed (en)
SCC
gold:hypernym
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is Wikipage redirect of
is Wikipage disambiguates of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 48 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software