Grant v Torstar Corp, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 640, 2009 SCC 61, is a 2009 Supreme Court of Canada decision on the defences to the tort of defamation. The Supreme Court ruled that the law of defamation should give way to the rights of a party to speak on matters of public interest, provided the party exercises a certain level of responsibility in verifying the potentially defamatory facts. This decision recognizes a defence of responsible communication on matters of public interest.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Grant v Torstar Corp (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Grant v Torstar Corp, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 640, 2009 SCC 61, is a 2009 Supreme Court of Canada decision on the defences to the tort of defamation. The Supreme Court ruled that the law of defamation should give way to the rights of a party to speak on matters of public interest, provided the party exercises a certain level of responsibility in verifying the potentially defamatory facts. This decision recognizes a defence of responsible communication on matters of public interest. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
JoinMajority
| - Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell. (en)
|
citations
| |
date
| |
history
| - APPEAL and CROSS‑APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal , Grant v. Torstar Corporation, 2008 ONCA 796, 92 OR 561, 301 DLR 129, 243 OAC 120, 61 CCLT 195, 71 CPR 352, [2008] OJ No 4783 , 2008 CarswellOnt 7155, setting aside a decision of Rivard J. and a jury award and ordering a new trial. (en)
|
majority
| |
reason
| - More details from a reliable legal source are desirable. (en)
- Property described in Globe and Mail article is on Lake Timiskaming and has no golf course, whereas the property in the lawsuit is on Twin Lakes. Article mentions that a golf course is for sale; a more specific citation is desirable. (en)
|
has abstract
| - Grant v Torstar Corp, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 640, 2009 SCC 61, is a 2009 Supreme Court of Canada decision on the defences to the tort of defamation. The Supreme Court ruled that the law of defamation should give way to the rights of a party to speak on matters of public interest, provided the party exercises a certain level of responsibility in verifying the potentially defamatory facts. This decision recognizes a defence of responsible communication on matters of public interest. (en)
|
case-name
| - Grant v Torstar Corp (en)
|
Concurrence/Dissent
| |
decided-date
| |
full-case-name
| - Peter Grant v Torstar Corporation (en)
|
heard-date
| |
ruling
| - Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed (en)
|
SCC
| |
gold:hypernym
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is Wikipage disambiguates
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |