About: Gabelli v. SEC

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Gabelli v. SEC Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:StatuteOfLimitations106533484, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FGabelli_v._SEC&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org

Gabelli v. SEC, 568 U.S. 442 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the statute of limitations for filing civil penalty actions initiates when the offending act is committed or finished. The Securities and Exchange Commission filed suit against Bruce Alpert and Marc Gabelli of Gabelli Funds, LLC, alleging the firm made secret agreements with Headstart Advisers Ltd concerning Headstart's investment in a mutual fund managed by Gabelli. Headstart realized large profits at the expense of Gabelli's remaining investors, and the SEC argued that Gabelli's actions violated the Investment Advisers Act. Gabelli and Alpert sought dismissal of the case, arguing the SEC lawsuit came after the five year statute of limitations expired. In response, the SEC argued that

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRobertsCourt yago:WikicatStatutesOfLimitations yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Communication100033020 yago:Document106470073 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:Law106532330 yago:LegalDocument106479665 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Writing106362953 yago:WrittenCommunication106349220 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case yago:StatuteOfLimitations106533484
rdfs:label	Gabelli v. SEC (en)
rdfs:comment	Gabelli v. SEC, 568 U.S. 442 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the statute of limitations for filing civil penalty actions initiates when the offending act is committed or finished. The Securities and Exchange Commission filed suit against Bruce Alpert and Marc Gabelli of Gabelli Funds, LLC, alleging the firm made secret agreements with Headstart Advisers Ltd concerning Headstart's investment in a mutual fund managed by Gabelli. Headstart realized large profits at the expense of Gabelli's remaining investors, and the SEC argued that Gabelli's actions violated the Investment Advisers Act. Gabelli and Alpert sought dismissal of the case, arguing the SEC lawsuit came after the five year statute of limitations expired. In response, the SEC argued that (en)
foaf:name	(en) Gabelli et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission (en)
dcterms:subject	2013 in United States case law United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission litigation Statutes of limitations
Wikipage page ID	40833076 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	929079790 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	2013 in United States case law John Roberts United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission litigation 2012 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States Statutes of limitations Fraud Westlaw 2d Cir. L. Ed. 2d Supreme Court of the United States Certiorari Statute of limitations Investment Advisers Act Gabelli Funds S.D.N.Y. F.3d F. App'x Securities and Exchange Commission U.S. LEXIS
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-1274_aplc.pdf https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=10959414279623128484 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/568/442/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4341916/26/securities-and-exchange-commission-v-gabelli/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/821431/gabelli-v-sec/ https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20110801057 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2012/2012_11_1274 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/11-1274
sameAs	Gabelli v. SEC Gabelli v. SEC Gabelli v. SEC Gabelli v. SEC
Subsequent	SEC v. Gabelli, 518 F. App'x 32 (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Usc dbt:Ussc
docket	11 (xsd:integer)
JoinMajority	unanimous (en)
OralArgument	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2012/2012_11_1274
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/11-1274
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
Prior	25920.0 (second)
USPage	442 (xsd:integer)
USVol	568 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-01-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	2013 (xsd:integer)
case	Gabelli v. SEC, (en)
courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/821431/gabelli-v-sec/
DecideDate	0001-02-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	2013 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Gabelli et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission (en)
Holding	The statute of limitations for filing civil penalty actions initiates when the offending act is committed. Reversed and remanded. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/568/442/
Litigants	Gabelli v. SEC (en)
majority	Roberts (en)
other source	Supreme Court (en)
other url	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-1274_aplc.pdf
has abstract	Gabelli v. SEC, 568 U.S. 442 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the statute of limitations for filing civil penalty actions initiates when the offending act is committed or finished. The Securities and Exchange Commission filed suit against Bruce Alpert and Marc Gabelli of Gabelli Funds, LLC, alleging the firm made secret agreements with Headstart Advisers Ltd concerning Headstart's investment in a mutual fund managed by Gabelli. Headstart realized large profits at the expense of Gabelli's remaining investors, and the SEC argued that Gabelli's actions violated the Investment Advisers Act. Gabelli and Alpert sought dismissal of the case, arguing the SEC lawsuit came after the five year statute of limitations expired. In response, the SEC argued that under the discovery rule, the statute had not expired when the case was filed. In a unanimous decision, Chief Justice John Roberts ruled against the federal government's argument that the discovery rule determined the statute of limitations for filing the fraud lawsuit. Roberts' opinion explained that the discovery rule, which starts the statute of limitations once the plaintiff becomes aware of the fraud, applies only to victims of the fraud itself. Government regulatory agencies are subject to the standard rule, which initiates the standard of limitations upon the perpetration of the fraud. Under this earlier threshold, the SEC missed the five-year deadline to file suit against Gabelli. The Supreme Court's decision reversed the earlier decision of the Second Circuit, and the case was remanded to the lower courts. (en)
googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=10959414279623128484
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Gabelli_v._SEC?oldid=929079790&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	4743 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Gabelli_v._SEC
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court Gabelli v SEC

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 60 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software