About: DPP v Santana-Bermudez     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FDPP_v_Santana-Bermudez&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org

Director of Public Prosecutions v Santa-Bermudez [2003] EWHC 2908 (Admin), also known as DPP v Santana-Bermudez, is a 2003 decision of the Divisional Court of Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, considering an appeal by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) in a criminal assault case.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • DPP v Santana-Bermudez (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Director of Public Prosecutions v Santa-Bermudez [2003] EWHC 2908 (Admin), also known as DPP v Santana-Bermudez, is a 2003 decision of the Divisional Court of Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, considering an appeal by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) in a criminal assault case. (en)
name
  • DPP v Santa-Bermudez (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
citations
  • 168 (xsd:integer)
  • (en)
  • [2003] EWHC 2908 ] (en)
  • [2003] All ER 168 (en)
  • [2004] Crim LR 471, DC (en)
court
full name
  • Director of Public Prosecutions v Santa-Bermudez (en)
judges
  • (en)
  • Mr Justice Mackay (en)
  • Mr Justice Maurice Kay (en)
keywords
  • (en)
  • omission (en)
has abstract
  • Director of Public Prosecutions v Santa-Bermudez [2003] EWHC 2908 (Admin), also known as DPP v Santana-Bermudez, is a 2003 decision of the Divisional Court of Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, considering an appeal by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) in a criminal assault case. The defendant, Santa-Bermudez, had lied about the presence of sharp objects in his pocket when being searched by a female police constable and the constable was injured. The defendant was charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm but he argued that as he had not actively committed any action that led to the injury, he lacked the required actus reus for the crime to have been committed. Although convicted at the magistrates' court, the defendant appealed to the Crown Court which found in his favour and dismissed the case. The DPP appealed to the High Court, which ruled that the defendant's willful omission, which put the constable in a dangerous situation, was sufficient actus reus for the crime to have been committed. (en)
appealed from
concurring
  • Mackay J (en)
date decided
decision by
  • Maurice Kay J (en)
number of judges
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 40 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software