About: City of Chicago v. Morales

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: City of Chicago v. Morales Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FCity_of_Chicago_v._Morales&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org

City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a law cannot be so vague that a person of ordinary intelligence can not figure out what is innocent activity and what is illegal.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label	City of Chicago v. Morales (en)
rdfs:comment	City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a law cannot be so vague that a person of ordinary intelligence can not figure out what is innocent activity and what is illegal. (en)
foaf:name	(en) City of Chicago, Petitioner v. Jesus Morales, et al. (en)
dcterms:subject	Chicago Police Department United States Supreme Court cases Void for vagueness case law United States statutory interpretation case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court 1999 in United States case law American Civil Liberties Union litigation
Wikipage page ID	19654295 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1039195237 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	American Law Reports Chicago Police Department John Paul Stevens United States Supreme Court cases Mens rea Crime Void for vagueness case law Loitering ACLU United States statutory interpretation case law Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court 1999 in United States case law American Civil Liberties Union litigation Chicago L. Ed. 2d Supreme Court of the United States Illinois Supreme Court Police officer Human intelligence Certiorari Illinois Appellate Court N.E.2d U.S. LEXIS
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/527/41.html https://www.oyez.org/cases/1998/97-1121 http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/summary_0199-1553616_ITM https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/527/41/ https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/97-1121.ZS.html http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep527/usrep527041/usrep527041.pdf
sameAs	City of Chicago v. Morales City of Chicago v. Morales City of Chicago v. Morales City of Chicago v. Morales
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Quote dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc
Dissent	Thomas (en) Scalia (en)
JoinDissent	Rehnquist, Scalia (en)
JoinMajority	O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
LawsApplied	Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1998/97-1121
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
Prior	17280.0 (second)
USPage	41 (xsd:integer)
USVol	527 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-12-09 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	1998 (xsd:integer)
case	City of Chicago v. Morales, (en)
DecideDate	0001-06-10 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1999 (xsd:integer)
findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/527/41.html
fullname	City of Chicago, Petitioner v. Jesus Morales, et al. (en)
Holding	Chicago's Gang Congregation Ordinance violates due process in that it is impermissibly vague on its face and an arbitrary restriction on personal liberties. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/527/41/
Litigants	City of Chicago v. Morales (en)
majority	Stevens (en)
loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep527/usrep527041/usrep527041.pdf
has abstract	City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a law cannot be so vague that a person of ordinary intelligence can not figure out what is innocent activity and what is illegal. (en)
Concurrence	Stevens (en) Kennedy (en) O'Connor (en) Breyer (en)
cornell	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/97-1121.ZS.html
JoinConcurrence	Breyer (en) Souter, Ginsburg (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:City_of_Chicago_v._Morales?oldid=1039195237&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	6842 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:City_of_Chicago_v._Morales

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 44 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software